Loop critique

Soldato
Joined
1 Mar 2010
Posts
14,915
Location
Voting Conservative.
This is my planned loop. After several starts, I will build it when I have sorted all the bits. Does this look OK for a CPU only loop with 2 x 120 rads in a v1000 case? The case has the mobo upside down so it all sits below the gfx card in the bottom half of the case. Except the res and pump which are alongside it.

Please give your views

 
I thought the loop started at the pump? pulling fluid from the res and sending into the cpu block. Then the flow goes rad> rad > res

So full loop is Pump > cpu > front rad > rear rad > res.

Res is highest point so pump is always primed, the flow into the res is though an inner tube and the pump pulls from the base of the res.

Am I right or wrong?
 
no definite right and wrong here bud.

I've always followed the mantra of:

Coldest water in the loop (ie straight out of the RAD) goes straight into the hottest component (ie the CPU)

to be honest, physics usually dictates that after a while running, the water will reach an equilibrium around the loop in relation to the room temp. (theres an equation for this somewhere - basically, the heat still gets dumped via air (fans and rad into the air in the room).

The best advice i think is as long as the loop is primed (cleared of air pockets) and STAYS that way then job's a good 'un :D
 
@ OP your reasoning is clear. The other advantage you can look for is water leaving radiators at a higher point than where it enters, as this helps avoid trapping air in the system and so makes bleeding easier. That's also how you've drawn it.

The usual mantra is that loop order doesn't matter, as it all ends up the same temperature anyway. There is a temperature drop across radiators and a rise across the cpu block, but it's fractions of a degree. Minimising bends and length of pipes to reduce pressure loss is probably more beneficial. If instead you want to go pump -> radiators -> cpu block -> reservoir then fair enough, thermodynamically there's a slight advantage.

In contrast, I believe there is a (fluid dynamics) advantage to placing the cpu block immediately after the pump, but I would attribute this to the flow immediately out of the pump being very turbulent. Given a long distance flowing down a pipe, the flow will reach a (probably still turbulent) steady profile. I would rather send the swirly, messy flow into the cpu block (which is usually designed to increase turbulence further) than a relatively clean, stable flow.

So, there is an argument for block first (turbulence) and one for block last (temperature), where neither effect has any realistic chance of being worth a degree centigrade. Still, I hope that made for slightly interesting reading regardless. Plumb it in whatever order takes your fancy :)
 
Thanks Jon for the useful info and considered opinion. Also to Andy.

As an engineer having dealt in the past with slightly larger (150mm bore) sludge pumping setups, I had one or two preconceived ideas, The effects of turbulent flow on the cpu block had not occurred to me though. I will have to look out a reference on Newtonian fluids etc. :)
 
Back
Top Bottom