I don't know if insurers here offer it but in the US you can retain the equivalent of NCD and loyalty bonuses for a fairly small fee if you plan on going without a car for a while. Does anyone know if any insurers in the UK offer this?
Its having someone as the policy holder/main driver when they are not. Named drivers is not fronting.

I didn't know this either, been driving for 10 years![]()
I don't know if insurers here offer it but in the US you can retain the equivalent of NCD and loyalty bonuses for a fairly small fee if you plan on going without a car for a while. Does anyone know if any insurers in the UK offer this?
tut tut her dad as main driver when you using the car as a daily driver, clearly illegal
....
This happened to me in 2004, but, I bought a stupidly cheap car, rarely used it, and paid the crappy £150 a year to insure it, just so I wouldn't loose my no claims.
NCD is the biggest load of twaddle anyway.
A) You can protect it. I can have 9 years NCD and had 2 claims. Pointless.
B) It expires, as it has to this poor chap in the OP, despite the fact that he still has had "no claims" for the past 11 years.
C) It doesn't 'mirror', yet points/claims do.
C) claims are claims and increase risks, points are applied to your license, you only have one license. So again Totaly Resonable.
A) you can protect NCD ie the discount as in the name, you still have to declare claims and premium will still go up.
B) shock at people who don't drive losing NCD, maybe if you don't drive you lose the skills, hence don't qualify for discount.
C) claims are claims and increase risks, points are applied to your license, you only have one license. So again Totaly Resonable.
You pay a huge premimum for protecting it, the stats and revenu work out in the insurers interest, not yours.A) That was my point,by defintion NCB is to show your historic driving safety/risk - if you've had a claim, it renders NCB moot, yet you can still 'use it' if you've protected it.
C) Totally reasonable? I've got 9 years NCB, showing I'm a low risk client. Insurer number 1 notes this, gives me a good discount. Insurer 2 ignores it, giving me the same premium as someone who's not been driving for the last 9 years? Yet if I've got points/accidents, they're happy to take the negatives into account on all policies?
NCB is a total sham.
That is certainly interesting and Im going to remember that.....really sucks, I feel for you.
I do share a certain amount of your pain.....I had 10 years insured driving experience (and associated NCB)in New Zealand, and had it all count for nothing when I immigrated to the UK, had to start from scratch again.
Not as bad as your situation Ill admit, but I was still bitter....the driving rules are so similar I didnt even have to sit a test over here, it was just a straight license swap. Meant nothing to the insurance companies however.
In any event, you have my sympathy.
That is certainly interesting and Im going to remember that.....really sucks, I feel for you.
I do share a certain amount of your pain.....I had 10 years insured driving experience (and associated NCB)in New Zealand, and had it all count for nothing when I immigrated to the UK, had to start from scratch again.
Not as bad as your situation Ill admit, but I was still bitter....the driving rules are so similar I didnt even have to sit a test over here, it was just a straight license swap. Meant nothing to the insurance companies however.
In any event, you have my sympathy.

NCD is the biggest load of twaddle anyway.
A) You can protect it. I can have 9 years NCD and had 2 claims. Pointless.
B) It expires, as it has to this poor chap in the OP, despite the fact that he still has had "no claims" for the past 11 years.
C) It doesn't 'mirror', yet points/claims do.
How is it a total sham? The sham bit is protecting it. NCD is an easy way to show reduced risk that is transferable between companies.