This bit is interesting - it's an omission (not addressing the claim) rather than a negation of his position but still I guess he'd have liked to have had some legal ruling stating the wallet is his which he could then presumably use as the basis of some crypto project. Presumably, he was hoping to grab a million or two that way?
Interesting re: the ownership of the drive too, that's apparently undisputed as Newport District Council; I had previously assumed that the seemingly different accounts re: whether he'd thrown it out or his gf had related to some attempt by him to still claim ownership of the drive itself but I guess that's moot if they both agree that the drive isn't his and only the IP/crypto stores on it is.
