• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

LuxMark 2.0 Bench Thread

2700k5.3Ghz
260X Crossfire @1320/1800
14.7 RC3

Luxball

vsiD9FP.jpg


Sala

WuczPos.jpg


Complex

oTVOQWZ.jpg
 
Sorry Matt but I needed to find out what the 9 series were like on this bench for another thread.

4 X GTX 980 @1502/2102
5960X @4.0
247.09 drivers

Ew7fQsf.jpg
 
Just ran the other two presets as well.

4 X GTX 980 @1502/2052
5960X @4.0
247.09 drivers

hp9oSrj.jpg






4 X GTX 980 @1502/2102
5960X @4.0
247.09 drivers

LagW8B0.jpg


Cheers Matt

I won't be doing any single card runs on the 9 series unless someone wants to know how they go.:)
 
Single GPU results

Crossed out the clock speeds as they are wrong.

GTX 980 @ 1380Mhz/1753Mhz
Driver 347.09 WHQL

LuxBall

LuxBall1GPU_zpsd89f0c99.jpg

Salsa

Salsa1GPU_zps8cdbe4e0.jpg

Room

Room1GPU_zps3a14b0e8.jpg

Dual GPU results

Each GTX 980 ran at independent clock speeds when both used at the same time.

GTX 980 @ 1380Mhz/1753Mhz
GTX 980 @ 1367Mhz/1753Mhz

LuxBall

LuxBall2GPU_zpscbe123c6.jpg

Salsa

Salsa2GPU_zps09fae9fc.jpg

Room

Room2GPU_zpsb80e770b.jpg
 
Is this about right for a GTX970? There's some confusion about the scores over on the Photography forum as Anandtech's original benches put the 980 at around the 1600 mark at launch.

LuxMark.JPG
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom