• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

LuxMark 2.0 Bench Thread

Setup: Crossfire 280X @ 1050:1500
Driver: 14.9


Sala Medium
1384fd5288d700e2b8f1d23c017fab91.png

LuxBall HDR
5b2f405017a8fd4ee85b985a3e75b2e2.png

Room Complex
f2124409d57b90575c32a3f761f63327.png
 
Last edited:
Just ran the other two presets as well.

4 X GTX 980 @1502/2052
5960X @4.0
247.09 drivers

hp9oSrj.jpg





4 X GTX 980 @1502/2102
5960X @4.0
247.09 drivers

LagW8B0.jpg

Cheers Matt

I won't be doing any single card runs on the 9 series unless someone wants to know how they go.:)
 
Single GPU results

Crossed out the clock speeds as they are wrong.

GTX 980 @ 1380Mhz/1753Mhz
Driver 347.09 WHQL

LuxBall

LuxBall1GPU_zpsd89f0c99.jpg

Salsa

Salsa1GPU_zps8cdbe4e0.jpg

Room

Room1GPU_zps3a14b0e8.jpg

Dual GPU results

Each GTX 980 ran at independent clock speeds when both used at the same time.

GTX 980 @ 1380Mhz/1753Mhz
GTX 980 @ 1367Mhz/1753Mhz

LuxBall

LuxBall2GPU_zpscbe123c6.jpg

Salsa

Salsa2GPU_zps09fae9fc.jpg

Room

Room2GPU_zpsb80e770b.jpg
 
Is this about right for a GTX970? There's some confusion about the scores over on the Photography forum as Anandtech's original benches put the 980 at around the 1600 mark at launch.

LuxMark.JPG
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom