Luxury Car
- Thread starter Sone
- Start date
![[TW]Fox](/data/man-of-honor/2009.png){kind=avatar}
Have you tried one yet mate?
Fair enough.
[TW]Fox;12180112 said:
To be honest, I'd rather have an E38 without the comms pack. The Satnav isnt as good as a TomTom in terms of naviation, and is a lot more expensive to get map updates for. If your into customizing the 16:9 widescreen is nice for use with a Car Computer though.
I've had BMW's for years and never found that they are to costly to run, with the exception of fuel... 4L V8's are thirsty buggers. Servicing costs on the 4L were not much higher than a VW with a VR6 engine!, and I've yet to have a major mechanical failer (probably just doomed by Turbo to blow now).
Its worth looking around for a car with a lot of extras included, especially the uprated stereo (DSP Model). It has better speakers, and an acceptable poweramp in the boot. The stereos' powered purely off the factory head unit are pretty poor. I got the 12speaker Hi-Fi factory setup in my E39, and after I added a sub it really sounds quite nice, and more than loud enough.
By sticking with 2000+ cars you nicely avoid the Nikasil engine rot problems of the M60 engine, which made it into early E38s (94-96), Although my last E34 had a 3L M60 engine, with Nikasil coating, and it was still going strong with 200k miles.
Last edited:
a quick look on 'trader has got me interested in the S-Class now though. Didn't realise they were so cheap and they do look a lot newer than the e38.
I am like a kid in a sweetshop
Tried insurance quotes on them? For some reason insurers don't seem to like the idea of insuring me on an S-class, but are fine with things like Audi A8s, 5 and 7-series etc.
S500 was a no go with current insurers, S320 CDI is just an admin fee from the Volvo.
The S320CDI is rubbish and largely pointless. It is also miles more unreliable - i can see huge bills with a CDI S-class. Get a petrol or don't bother
As i said in my other post, fantastic cars but please do get into the mindset that 4 figure bills are normal, else you will get annoyed with it very quickly.
As i said in my other post, fantastic cars but please do get into the mindset that 4 figure bills are normal, else you will get annoyed with it very quickly.
Associate
- Joined
- 26 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 1,728
- Location
- Surrey
Oooh, those S500's look like a nice cheapish option for me. Due to the low annual mileage I do I doubt the mpg would really be any different to currently and the insurance is cheaper too!
After checking a fair few S430s and S500s at the cheaper end of the market and all have dodgy history (5+ owners, write offs, outstanding credit one was even listed as being scrapped on HPI!)
Seen a nice S320 petrol, its a lot better on the insurance and while its not fast performance seems acceptable. Is it worth traveling to have a look or is it worth spending the extra on a V8?
Seen a nice S320 petrol, its a lot better on the insurance and while its not fast performance seems acceptable. Is it worth traveling to have a look or is it worth spending the extra on a V8?
I dont see the point in the 6 cylinder one - it needs to be a V8.
Although with an S Class you want at least several thousand quid in reserve for fixing it if you are running it on a budget or are not wealthy enough to shrug off frequent 4 figure bills.
Although with an S Class you want at least several thousand quid in reserve for fixing it if you are running it on a budget or are not wealthy enough to shrug off frequent 4 figure bills.
Personally I would leave the S, I don't really rate it,
I would go for the Lexus LS or the BMW.
The lexus should however be VERY reliable, I have tried one, it's a bit bargy but it's a decent car with plenty of go if needs must.
Cars in this sector are wallet cripplers, you should be able to get away with an LS.
But thats ok becuase we know you have some very odd tastes. Reliability gremlins aside, the Mercedes Benz S Class is the finest luxury car in the world. The BMW is more sporty, the Lexus is more reliable but the S Class is just... better.