MacPro/Studio Use.

Neoni

Neoni

Neoni

Soldato
Joined
26 Dec 2004
Posts
13,323
Location
Sweatshop.
Right i wont give away too much,

but what mac should i be looking for, for commercial studio use? i mean it could be going through pretty heavy recording sessions, and due to the application and hardware, relying on the "Host" processing, Quad core be enough, tackle everything i throw at it?

or all out with an 8 core?

-Alex
 
Well, one of the studios I run still has a Power Mac dual G5 2.7. It will run happily up to about 45 tracks in Cubase/PT/Logic so long as you're sensible with processing.

It really depends how many plug ins and the like you're going to use. Obviously more 'powah' is better. :)

What's your budget?
 
Neoni said:
Right i wont give away too much,

Quad core be enough, tackle everything i throw at it? or all out with an 8 core?

-Alex
Click to expand...

How can we tell you what Mac Pro is best if you won't tell us what you plan on running and what your budget is?

Anyway the standard Apple buying advice fits here and that is buy the best Mac Pro you can afford.
 
LordSplodge said:
How can we tell you what Mac Pro is best if you won't tell us what you plan on running and what your budget is?

Anyway the standard Apple buying advice fits here and that is buy the best Mac Pro you can afford.
Click to expand...

budget pretty much, hopefully wont be an issue?

and itll be used for Music production, mainly pro-tools, quite heavy track and extensive use.
 
It depends on the complexity of the recordings, as mentioned.

You may find the quad is fine for handling 48 tracks, but 48 tracks with compressor, reverb, delay, phaser, flange and it may decide to cry.

Don't forget the hardware DSP can only take so much too, so there's always a limit.

I'd go with a low end Octo, over a quad personally :cool:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
24 tracks - don't need too much power, my iMac can happily take 30 tracks with plenty of plugins (although I need to start adding compensation delay if it gets a bit too much!)
 
Low end Octo then oodles of RAM...they keep on soldiering on :)

Get the RAM from crucial as much as you can afford really :)
 
If it's a pro setup i'm assuming you'll be running a PT HD rig? As the DSPs will do some of the processing.
However, i would stretch to what ever you can get to be honest, so get an octo, but PT is fairly efficient - i've seen quad's easily handle 60+ tracks with a load of plugins. Even my cacky Q6600 with an LE rig happily chugs away with 32 tracks, loaded up with virtual instruments and plugins.
Also note that plugins like Altiverb and virtual instruments will use a lot of ram and processing power, compared to compressors/gates/delays etc which use very little (certainly less ram compared to cpu usage). But the norm is usually 8GB, i've seen more than this is most PTHD rigged studios, apart from a few big 5/6/7/8.1 mixing studios that have "to the max" mac's.

Again, throw some cash at the drives - decent OS drive, huge fast audio drive etc + backup solution!!!!
 
visibleman said:
If it's a pro setup i'm assuming you'll be running a PT HD rig? As the DSPs will do some of the processing.
However, i would stretch to what ever you can get to be honest, so get an octo, but PT is fairly efficient - i've seen quad's easily handle 60+ tracks with a load of plugins. Even my cacky Q6600 with an LE rig happily chugs away with 32 tracks, loaded up with virtual instruments and plugins.
Also note that plugins like Altiverb and virtual instruments will use a lot of ram and processing power, compared to compressors/gates/delays etc which use very little (certainly less ram compared to cpu usage). But the norm is usually 8GB, i've seen more than this is most PTHD rigged studios, apart from a few big 5/6/7/8.1 mixing studios that have "to the max" mac's.

Again, throw some cash at the drives - decent OS drive, huge fast audio drive etc + backup solution!!!!
Click to expand...

Not HD, theres no need for it with the current power of LE.
 
Neoni said:
Not HD, theres no need for it with the current power of LE.
Click to expand...

In which case you're limited to 32 tracks (currently PT8 allows you two record 32 tracks as well but i think they'll take it out like they did with 7.x), so an octo would be overkill!!! Same with 12GB ram, you won't use it. Get a quad, 8GB ram, plenty of storage and spend the rest of pre's - especially if you're planning to use the 002/003, horrible horrible pre's.
 
visibleman said:
In which case you're limited to 32 tracks (currently PT8 allows you two record 32 tracks as well but i think they'll take it out like they did with 7.x), so an octo would be overkill!!! Same with 12GB ram, you won't use it. Get a quad, 8GB ram, plenty of storage and spend the rest of pre's - especially if you're planning to use the 002/003, horrible horrible pre's.
Click to expand...

Protools 8 allows 48 Tracks+ Music production tool kit i believe can push it to 100+, im not going to be using a 002, 002 pres are awful, but the 003 pre's arent that bad, im currently hooked up to an old school 01v, but im going to be investing in a desk when alls up and running.
 
Either way, you need oodles of RAM :D

I'm running 9gb in mine and when I'm browsing RAWs in aperture (about 10-15mb each) I can scroll, look at, edit them in nion real time.
 
Phate said:
Either way, you need oodles of RAM :D

I'm running 9gb in mine and when I'm browsing RAWs in aperture (about 10-15mb each) I can scroll, look at, edit them in nion real time.
Click to expand...

Have you seen the images that Bert Monroy has created?

His last piece was well over 2GB big (just the composite), 15,000 layers. Utter madness :eek::D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom