How does what you get paid per mile matter with regards to your fuel costs? The fuel is still out of your pocket. I get paid per mile too, yet keep my fuel economy to an absolute maximum.
Because unless you dip below an MPG which means you're getting reimbursed less than it costs you to travel, your statement makes no sense?
How doesn't it?
You get paid 45p per mile say, and your fuel costs you 20p per mile, so you 'make' 25p per mile. If your fuel costs you 15p per mile instead, you 'make' 30p per mile.
You're still wasting money you could potentially be having in your pocket.
How doesn't it?
You get paid 45p per mile say, and your fuel costs you 20p per mile, so you 'make' 25p per mile. If your fuel costs you 15p per mile instead, you 'make' 30p per mile.
You're still wasting money you could potentially be having in your pocket.
So opportunity cost then. Which is only a 'cost' if you perceive it to be one.
I cover fuel, servicing, tyres, insurance and VED with my mileage allowance. Driving as frugally as possible for the sake of a few quid a week doesn't even occur to me, frankly. If it did, I'd drive a Bluemotion.
I also like to use my electric rear blind to wind people up even further who are dying to get past yet I am still overtaking!
Anyone else's cruise control max out at 89mph?
Which is really only a bit over 80 on the GPS.
110km/h in the 300zx, it sucks. Must be a Nissan thing![]()
110km/h in the 300zx, it sucks. Must be a Nissan thing![]()
Of course there are exceptions; there are pockets of the UK with a much lower traffic density and if you only drive in those areas then standard cruise will be fine. If you only drive north of Preston for instance then you'll have the M6 all to yourself.
If though, you're driving on any motorway in the UK which passes near or through a major city at rush hour then forget using standard cruise.
The amount of mileage you cover has nothing to do with my argument - it's about when and where you are driving.
Because unless you dip below an MPG which means you're getting reimbursed less than it costs you to travel, your statement makes no sense?
How doesn't it?
You get paid 45p per mile say, and your fuel costs you 20p per mile, so you 'make' 25p per mile. If your fuel costs you 15p per mile instead, you 'make' 30p per mile.
You're still wasting money you could potentially be having in your pocket.