I think he means they get sites to the top without paying
google
There are many many factors, but the real balls of the matter are:
• create a site with great content
• code the site well
• get quality incoming links from reputable sources
• dont overdo all the keyword stuff, keep everything natural
then... wait - it wont happen overnight
We have a winner
However little it counts for, proper semanticly correct, css based layouts do help as well.
They really, really don't... gah...
It's like people saying aspx pages rank higher than asp pages, or cfm pages rank higher than asp pages.... Heck there was a thing going around last year that was .SEO files rank higher in google.
As long as the points Quicksilver made are pretty much covered, your page extension could just be .BOOBIES - as long as a search engine can read the page and it realises everything is normal and not being spoofed, has good quality links in and out (that are relevant) and go where they say, then it will rank as well as any other type of page.
Have you never heard of
PageRank before or something?
Pagerank is worth nothing at all... I wish people would forget about pagerank... it's just a tool, not the be all and end all of SEO
SEO is changing soon though form using meta tags and inbound links as to where you can be placed.
Search engines like google are going to change and use "respectable" website links to help rank your site
ie If your website is linked to a .gov website it would be ranked higher than if it was linked to a .com/co.uk. The same rule will apply for other sites such as .org etc
Not sure when they are implementing this though but I know it is occuring
Also make sure that all your links on your page are full links
ie
http://www.tom.com/bob.html not just bob.html
If you were using an ecommerce shop then putting the item name in the URL would also help push their page rank up incase people search for a specific product
Google has been doing that for years, pretty much since it was created. A link from a reputable website or domain is worth more than one from say a geocities site for example.
That URL thing just cannot be true, I've always been in the habit mixing and links (some with www. some with just bob.html as you said) and never seen any preference to the ones with the full path name.
Matt Cutts has said that Google don't use URLs to donate a final position. The only thing a domain name, or pagename will do is appear bold in google to show the user that this page
may be more relevant.
Whether what he says has any truth or not, to be honest I've seen old website I've worked on where a page has a map of pembrokeshire on it and the page was called purple.asp, it ranked no 1 in google... experimenting with it took that page down replaced it with map-of-pembrokeshire.asp (and changed all relevant links) and it ranked at no 1 as well (I believe it has dropped since then though).
SEO isn't a quick fix, it's constant work... it's easier to get to number one than to stay at number one. Other companies out there are getting an idea that it's now important to have a high ranking site in google, so it makes our jobs harder to keep our sites there.