Man and dinosaurs, when did we first know about them?

Glaucus said:
I like how you link it as a dinosaur and ignore the article. No surprise there. Ignoring everything to suppport your goal.
Click to expand...

lol what?
I guess you mean that it was concluded to be a basking shark by the amino acid chains in the carcass. :D Funny though no one knows the amino acid chains of a plesiosaur.

My goal is nothing more than the truth.

I bring one more thing to the table, the yarra. Check out tribal paintings of it. It even shows an outline of the gastro-intestinal tract, indicating that these animals had been hunted and butchered.

I find it undeniable these creatures have coexisted with us, to some extent at least. As a child I kind of knew it too.



Some more very interesting pictures and info:- http://www.docstoc.com/docs/57757705/Dinos-or-Dragons---Unlocking-SAR
 
Last edited:
Quite like a bit of cryptozoology to be honest, difficult to rule anything out. Look at the Coelacanth for example, which was comparable to finding a living dinosaur.
 
Last edited:
Glaucus said:
No its nt the ttruth at all and you dont seek it. Read the wiki, then come back. Why missoead with your posting.
Click to expand...

You drinking again? Keep the faith.

I love the mosaic of the romans hunting Krokodilopardalis. (Literally crocodile-leopard.)
 
Cavemen found bones, made up stories to scare their wives and made them believe hunting was a mans job..

Stories got past down the generations..
 
jmc007 said:
lol what?
I guess you mean that it was concluded to be a basking shark by the amino acid chains in the carcass. :D Funny though no one knows the amino acid chains of a plesiosaur.

My goal is nothing more than the truth.
Click to expand...

Er, what? No-one knows the amino acids of a plesiosaur? How is that relevant? The amino acids matched the basking shark so it's a basking shark. They were not unknown amino acids that therefore couldn't be a basking shark.

classic argument by false connections and claims of undeniable logic when the reality is the complete opposite of logic and connectivity. You people are are as desperate as a Year 11 boy at a school disco (and of roughly equivalent levels of knowledge about life)
 
jmc007 said:
lol what?
I guess you mean that it was concluded to be a basking shark by the amino acid chains in the carcass. :D Funny though no one knows the amino acid chains of a plesiosaur.

My goal is nothing more than the truth.

I bring one more thing to the table, the yarra. Check out tribal paintings of it. It even shows an outline of the gastro-intestinal tract, indicating that these animals had been hunted and butchered.

I find it undeniable these creatures have coexisted with us, to some extent at least. As a child I kind of knew it too.



Some more very interesting pictures and info:- http://www.docstoc.com/docs/57757705/Dinos-or-Dragons---Unlocking-SAR
Click to expand...

Not sure if trolling or just stupid and uninformed

B@
 
MikeTimbers said:
Er, what? No-one knows the amino acids of a plesiosaur? How is that relevant? The amino acids matched the basking shark so it's a basking shark. They were not unknown amino acids that therefore couldn't be a basking shark.

classic argument by false connections and claims of undeniable logic when the reality is the complete opposite of logic and connectivity. You people are are as desperate as a Year 11 boy at a school disco (and of roughly equivalent levels of knowledge about life)
Click to expand...

The link was really to get people thinking, I understand and I agree with the lines of evidence strongly indicating that the Zuiyo-maru carcass was a large shark, and most likely a basking shark, rather than a plesiosaur.
Doubts still remain, including the observed large hind fins, the small, hard head with the nares (nostrils) at the front of the head, the existence of the decaying fat, and the presence of red flesh so that many still believe it was a plesiosaur.
 
Doubts which are not really evidence based. Very few animals can live for longer than 100 years, that we know of at least. The large ones, however, are noticeable and therefore likely to be mostly known of. It's pretty doubtful that a plesiosaur could live until now, considering all the environmental changes that have taken place, and, more simply, the age of it. If it really was a dinosaur, it must have been incredibly old and therefore would likely be enormous.

I don't think the evidence that you've presented is really sufficient to conclude that it's a dinosaur.
 
LOAM said:
Turned, I think that's how it started out Mr.C
Click to expand...

To be fair, I wasn't paying a lot of attention...I skim read the OP and thought he was actually asking a proper question...that'll teach me...:eek:

In any case I have heard some pretty wacko justifications for Literal Creationism, but what sounds like the continued existence of secret Dinosaurs is.....well, I'm speechless!! :eek:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom