mavity Control By Los Alamos National Laboratory

What exactly is 'mavity acceleration'. Surely, it is 'acceleration due to mavity' not the other way around.

Nitpicking aside, i'll believe it when i see it. If this was so substantial, you would think it would have made a bit more of a splash that a thread on a conspiracy forum of whackjobs :P
 
So where can I buy my jetpack and brain destorying Electro-magnetic machine thing which will make me float?
 
After a very brief inspection of the paper it seems very very likely to be fake. The language is not up to the standard as would be accepted for a journal and surely something this fundamental would be in physical review letters or similar. I have not bothered to inspect the physics but it references no important journals either only some phd thesis and other random rubbish.

Basically it's carp.
 
bibalasvegas said:
After a very brief inspection of the paper it seems very very likely to be fake. The language is not up to the standard as would be accepted for a journal and surely something this fundamental would be in physical review letters or similar. I have not bothered to inspect the physics but it references no important journals either only some phd thesis and other random rubbish.

Basically it's carp.
Click to expand...

Like I said, no such thing as free energy.

Cheers :)
 
Had a brief nosy at the paper, whoever wrote it certanly is a scientist or understands scientific writing well. The equations I can only make out one or two then the rest go weird, its all written on understanding of quantum physics , to be honest its a fairly convincing paper as so far as presentation and what it speaks of in quantum physics is just 'what now', whoever wrote it is a) so far ahead in quantum understanding its probably true b) its a fake but so well presented and written it must have taken someone weeks/months to go to that much trouble
 
This is interesting, does anyone know much about the credibility of papers posted on the LANL site, can anyone post anything for review?

I see this at the bottom of the site:
arXiv is an e-print service in the fields of physics, mathematics, non-linear science, computer science, quantitative biology and statistics. The contents of arXiv conform to Cornell University academic standards. arXiv is owned, operated and funded by Cornell University, a private not-for-profit educational institution. arXiv is also partially funded by the National Science Foundation.
Click to expand...

Not saying this is credible however I do believe this kind of technology already exists but has been shelved for obvious reasons. I'll quote the late Ben Rich the former head of Lockheed Skunk Works:
We already have the means to travel among the stars, but these technologies are locked up in black projects and it would take an act of God to ever get them out to benefit humanity
Click to expand...
 
bibalasvegas said:
After a very brief inspection of the paper it seems very very likely to be fake. The language is not up to the standard as would be accepted for a journal and surely something this fundamental would be in physical review letters or similar. I have not bothered to inspect the physics but it references no important journals either only some phd thesis and other random rubbish.

Basically it's carp.
Click to expand...

Well its from Los Alamos, so i'd hope they wouldn't publish fake journals.
 
Looking at this guy's website he seems to have solved all the major problems in modern physics - quantum theory of mavity and a theory of everything. If this was the case he would win every prize going and be more famous than einstein. If he's not as part of a cover up then why does he post all his papers on his website? They are not in any journals - only on some servers. He also seems very quick to claim everything which seems at odds with the fact that he has not submitted his work to any journals or perhaps he did and they were rejected?

The person who wrote the papers does know a bit about physics but is not an expert - they seem to have read a few popular science books and looked at the layout of scientific papers but as I said the content is not up to a standard that would be acceptable for journals.
 
Free energy through mavity would not actually be free, though the amount of energy that could be obtained from any matter source would be.. astronomical, therefore highly efficient, it would actually result in the complete nullification of the matter used to generate such power. Thus overuse would have a certain, dangerous effect, though it may not be immediately apparent.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom