1.About the Supreme being the best... well they are other equally if not better blocks out there. Enzotech is offering a very good performance and a very solid build.
I am personally using the D-tek and couldn't be happier (the 3rd block I am trying)
I think the thing is that I've tried pretty much all of them. Not quite literally ALL of them - I haven't tried the Enzotech for instance. All the water-cooling specialists in the UK know me because I will, quite literally, try anything once. I've got AquaComputer Cuplex XT, D-Tek FuZion I & II with and without nozzles, Swiftech (including an original Cathar block), Danger-den, EK Wave, EK Supreme Rev 1 & 2, Full cover graphics card blocks, MIPS blocks, Alphacool blocks, Innovatek blocks (you can't sell those as they're mainly junk) - I even have some Koolance stuff.
So when I say I think the new EK Supreme is the best block on the market, I'm speaking from a position of authority on this. Believe me! If the Enzotech is better, I'll use that instead, as as soon as I've finished this, I'll go and order one
now... my complains was about the gfx blocks...
if EK was offering something similar to their cpu block base design then no problem..
but come on... to believe that these 4 waves in the middle actually offer much surface area.. well... I am sorry but that is like underestimating my inteligence.
since gpus give out more heat than the cpu.. how can you accept a block that is has by far an inferior design to a cpu block.
I will admit that having a full surfave block that cover core,mems and volt regulators is the best. but I am sorry EK's block is a pure commercial product imo.
As it just so happens I have an EK8800 GT(x/s) FC block right here.
The waved area over the GPU measures 45mm by 30mm and the waves add approx. 1cm extra to the length of metal (I used a piece of string and measured it - it's either 9mm or 10mm depending on slack). The 6 waves are exactly 5mm deep and they are 2mm apart. So there are 7 channels all 0.2 x 5.5 x 0.5cm = 0.5 square cm per channel or 3.5 square centimeteres of heat area. so by waving it he gets an extra 25% surface area.
As this was the graphics card in the machine with the corroded Swiftech CPU block, the acid water has left marks on the acetal top and you can clearly see the flow pattern through the block - by waving the fins he clearly slows down the water flow (more deposits in slower moving areas) which will give slightly better heat transfer. You also have to bear in mind that these things have to fit into a 2-slot gap and be compatible with SLi, allow for decent pipe work routing etc. etc. Look at the flow pattern - the amount of water in contact with the block at any one time is massive.
I think Eddy would be the first to admit he makes the best things he can make on his CNC machine rather than the best things possible but you are looking at 400g of copper in that block, and a huge water capacity for a water block, and all these things make them the best performing water-blocks overall. That's why they sell. And, as form follows function, they look great too.
take a moment to think of what I've said... and you'll see that I am right on this.
As I hope you appreciate, I've thought about what you have said, and rebutted your arguments pretty thoroughly. I'm open to be be convinced though, if you have anything more than opinions to back up your conclusions.