Associate
Oh dear more trouble for kimble, I guess that's what happens when lame hackers come out another get rich scheme.
That piratebay press release is the most pretentious load of BS I've seen for a long while.
Hollywood (et al) are content creators. People want the content they create. They want it enough to search for it, and download it.
piratebay doesn't create anything. Along with MegaUpload, they simply take other people's work, and publish it without their consent.
How that makes them "better than Hollywood" (their words) I fail to comprehend. That they think they are "competition" is laughable. They are pirates, and nothing more.
This. There's a lot more here than piracy.Oh dear more trouble for kimble, I guess that's what happens when lame hackers come out another get rich scheme.
They never said they were creators.
Pirate Bay is in fact a service, a better service than what the corporations offer and thus it thrives.
Well they don't have to pay for anything except server costs, and they offer all of their content - no, wait, someone else's content - for free.
How could anyone compete on those terms?
It's just about ease of access to content, if the corporations caught on to that use of sites such as tpb may drop. Hence why steam does so well.
Piratebays take on it for another angle:
No, it's about _free_ access to content. Piratebay would be just as popular even if it was very difficult to get the content, as long as you could get it free. Just as newsgroups used to be and BBSs back in the days where people where spending inordinate amounts of time and using a lot of technical skills, just to get something for free.
The premise of TPB statement is completely misdirected and I can't understand how they themselves can't see how delusional they are in what they are saying. Holywood took stories and recreated them in a new format (ignore the patent issue for a moment), they did not duplicate them and resold them. no one will stop you taking the plot of a movie and adapting it to a movie you make (many movies share the same plots anyway, and there are dozens of versions of the same book etc.), that's not copyright infringment. So the whole idea of Holywood infringing on Edison's copyright is laughable.
Yes, they bypassed his patent by relocating studios (if it's even true..) and that is/was illegal, but different laws apply to different countries even today, so it doesn't really stack up anyway.
It's simply impossible for the people who maintain these sites to check each and every file.
And then the whole argument over how expensive stuff is, and yet people apparently are still downloading £0.99 apps etc shows what the real motivation is here. People are cheap and nasty and if they think they can get away with it then they will.
they don't have to.
All they have to do is meet certain requirements to be safeguarded under US law. Namely remove such content when it is requested by the rights holder.
I thought they already did that?
.
Nope. Read the freak torrent article A page or two ago.
I wonder if the authorities will bother going through some Apache logs and chasing individuals who have been downloading illegal files, they could make some nice profits.