Meteors

You can't really get meteor shots like that, they are too fast to be able to react to, you need to just leave your camera set up and let it keep taking shots continuously.

It is just set up and hope that you get one in the frame which is why I would say to use the widest lens you have.

Isn't that exactly what I said I did? O.o

kd
 
A rough spotters' guide, taken on monday:
AJRpm0s.jpg.png

(about 100% crop, 8s @ f1.4, ISO 3200)

Can you guess which ones are meteors?
Satellite, satellite, meteor, satellite...
There's a surprising amount of traffic up there these days!
 
A rough spotters' guide, taken on monday:

(about 100% crop, 8s @ f1.4, ISO 3200)

Can you guess which ones are meteors?
[



Interesting, the same results as my pic above, you can't see them with the naked eye, but they show up with these long exposures.
 
There are plenty of bright ones you can see with the naked eye, but they flare up and disappear in a fraction of a second (and appear to last a moment longer as the after-image fades in your head.) The longer exposure is partly to increase your chances of capturing one, a little like shooting lightning, and also to give more exposure to the stars.

Photos don't really capture how dramatic they can look in real life though. That visceral sense of speed and scale, maybe something similar to a feeling of sudden acceleration such as take off in a plane. For me, movies don't really have much emotional impact for that sort of thing either. Especially the way modern CGI tends to be used; you know, that pretty but hollow, excessively storyboarded look... Even the videos of that big one that came down in Russia recently, spectacular as they were, are quite a bit removed from catching your breath as a direct witness. Maybe that's just my cynicism.
 
Back
Top Bottom