MG ZT-T 190+ / octavia vrs questions

Tbh, I really dont think you could go wrong with either of those cars. It really is going to come down to what impresses you the mosy, pros and cons of each. Personally, if it was me, it would the ZTT. Its just an amazing, comfy, all round car. You can get some serious suspension upgrades (although tbf, it is already good in the handling stakes [please dont take that as hot hatch capable though]), which will see this into a real B road blaster. I'm edging towards the ZT rather than the Tourer as this is all I need. Estate handling will not be quite as good.

So, in short, its your decision, but for me...MG
 
It looks bigger than it is but it is based on the Golf

I'd personally go for the MG, my Dad's got an '04 plate face lifted Rover 75 estate and it's rather nice.

I'd test drive them both before deciding though
 
i've drove both the cars i'm thinking of buying, as it stands now the ZT is just in front, this purely down to the price of the damn thing!
we've had both cars in at work before and i've always liked both, the vrs has a lot of boot space. but obv. the zt-t wins in that department!
both are 51 plates the octavia has 88k, the ztt 102k, so theres not a huge amount there, this was just a post to ask the question of things to look for, and as no alarm bells have rung and the laptop has exploded it looks like both are good for it, i know the vrs will live long VAG 'n all, but 102 on a rover/mg i wasn't sure about, and as i've said both are in fair/good nick - i'm not expecting a minta at that age & miles.
thanks for all the replies.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom