They've been doing the opposite if anything.
very true, in win7 you can uninstall ie which is a first
They've been doing the opposite if anything.
Last time I checked you don't actually need a web browser to access the Internet. Certainly don't need a browser to download a browser. Of course I am being pendantic here. I totally understand what people are saying, but I would just like to clarify that the Internet != Web Browser. The internet is not the little blue e.

Age has mellowed me a little bit, but I still find that MS supporters remind me of scientoligists. Despite the facts the still refuse to accept the truth.
Whereas the IE users are cool and really couldn't give a toss about owning the latest eye phone or whatever the latest hip web browser is this year.
What truth is that?
It's not IE users that are the scientologists... it's the alternative browser people. I accept this may be a coincidence but every single person I know that uses Opera/Firefox/whatever seems to be a complete zealot that wants to force their religion upon everyone else.
Whereas the IE users are cool and really couldn't give a toss about owning the latest eye phone or whatever the latest hip web browser is this year.
IE is like a Robin Reliant. (provided you don't have Flash 10 installed)
even now there are pages that dont work or look right in FF and how long has FF been out
Not really Firefox's fault if pages are coded for IE, is it? Firefox and all the other alternative browsers have a good level of standards compliance. If pages don't look right in them, it's most likely because the pages were designed with IE in mind, which doesn't always follow these standards.
What truth is that?
It's not IE users that are the scientologists... it's the alternative browser people. I accept this may be a coincidence but every single person I know that uses Opera/Firefox/whatever seems to be a complete zealot that wants to force their religion upon everyone else.
Whereas the IE users are cool and really couldn't give a toss about owning the latest eye phone or whatever the latest hip web browser is this year.
IE is like a Robin Reliant. (provided you don't have Flash 10 installed)

Fair enough. But I just don't understand why people would drive a Honda Jazz when they know all about the BMW M3 and could have one for the same cost. It's understandable if you don't know/care enough about cars to see how a Honda is different from a BMW. But if you were on a car forum posting in a thread about Hondas and BMWs, it could be inferred that you're aware of the distinctions and should act upon that information. Surely even people with no need for a fast car would take one over a slow car if the effort in obtaining one was nil.
That's where the analogy falls down. A BMW is more expensive to buy and run than a Honda. An alternative browser has no real drawbacks compared to IE, only benefits.
People with knowledge of something better are bound to try and promote it to others. It's not zealotry, it's just trying to help out.
Depends whether you think the additional time to install, maintain and learn to use an alternative browser (especially to get firefox into the state most proponants suggest) is worth the effort.
The problem though is that quite a lot of people seem to promote Mozilla Firefox purely based on security and say how it is a lot securer then Internet Explorer when in actual fact they are both relatively secure web browsers with IE being securer in Windows Vista.