Milly Dowler's voicemail was hacked by News of the Screws

You are lying. I've never posted an 'anti-Scottish rant'.

No, I'm not. I don't have the time just now because the wording didn't stick in my head, but I'll come back to you on it.

Pinky promise. :)


The definition of racism isn't mine, it is the definition: "The belief that all members of each race possess characteristics ... so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races."

There is no singularly accepted definition of racism, it is as to be expected a very contentious issue into which people disagree on the scope.

Are you honestly trying to give a literal interpretation that means no one native3 to the UK can be racist to anyone else in it?

Mince.

It isn't nice when someone unhinged posts completely unfounded accusations and lies about your character without proving them (instead, inventing cases completely).

They aren't unfounded nor are they lies but I admit I was wrong on the burns thread I confused you for other bigots there. ;)

It's how your personality comes across. I can't say any more than that, and I'm not apologising for it either if that's what you are fishing for.

You accuse me, I guess, of prejudice towards the rich. You have clearly shown it against the poor in Scotland for a start, without touching on the rest of your right wing lunacy. Suck it up, I love the smell of hypocrisy in the morning!
 
If you're going to make such a substantial claim about somebody, you sure as hell should have some good evidence to hand to back it up. Do you? You say you don;t have the time to find and show us it, yet you have the time to continue to post about the topic?

Show us all the evidence.

:rolleyes:

Evidence years of conversing with someone? As I said, give me time. If you all want it, I will absolutely guarantee you'll get it.

He's already admitted posting the videos himself but claims the thread was not serious, perhaps he should evidence that alongside real definative evidence that I am jealeous and prejudiced against 'Etonians' et al.
 
No, I'm not. I don't have the time just now because the wording didn't stick in my head, but I'll come back to you on it.
The thread was serious
I'll do the work for you.

It was this one: http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?p=19276966
Tesco shettleston is doing their 3 for £20 offer but it's going through the tills at 3 for £11 I now has 72 bottles of bud for £22
Yep, a very serious thread and a very serious 'anti-Scottish' rant from me, clearly :rolleyes:



There is no singularly accepted definition of racism, it is as to be expected a very contentious issue into which people disagree on the scope.
http://www.google.co.uk/search?sour...gc.r_pw.&fp=ce07ae90aca13e82&biw=1395&bih=896



They aren't unfounded nor are they lies
Yes, they are. You haven't yet shown me why your accusations of me being racist or xenophobic are founded.

You've absolutely failed here. You've been proven wrong and proven to be a liar. You are now trying to wriggle out of it - firstly by pretending you never called me a racist, secondly by arguing that there is no accepted definition of racism.
 
Last edited:
:rolleyes:

Evidence years of conversing with someone? As I said, give me time. If you all want it, I will absolutely guarantee you'll get it.

He's already admitted posting the videos himself but claims the thread was not serious, perhaps he should evidence that alongside real definative evidence that I am jealeous and prejudiced against 'Etonians' et al.

Calling somebody jealous of someone with a high level of education is a VERY different accusation to calling somebody a racist.

You still haven't shown any of this evidence.
 
Calling somebody jealous of someone with a high level of education is a VERY different accusation to calling somebody a racist.

You still haven't shown any of this evidence.

He also called me prejudiced, which is practically the same thing.

I have shown some evidence, he's partially admitted it himself although the topic was a joke to him so...
 
[TW]Fox;19536701 said:
I dont understand why he wont tell me which of the News International players involved in this thing are Etonian's :(

You've already had it fox, I'm not sure why you are struggling to understand it.

Intelligence normally isn't your problem.
 
He also called me prejudiced, which is practically the same thing.
So did several others. I'm clearly not the only one who felt your 'Etonian friends' remarks were prejudiced.


I have shown some evidence, he's partially admitted it himself although the topic was a joke to him so...
What evidence have you shown? I'm the only one who has been able to find anything, and I posted it above. Still nothing that shows me to be racist or xenophobic.


I'll do the work for you.

It was this one: http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?p=19276966
Tesco shettleston is doing their 3 for £20 offer but it's going through the tills at 3 for £11 I now has 72 bottles of bud for £22
Yep, a very serious thread and a very serious 'anti-Scottish' rant from me, clearly :rolleyes:

Still waiting to find out from you what shows me to be a racist or xenophobe.

Keep digging :)
 
You've already had it fox, I'm not sure why you are struggling to understand it.

Intelligence normally isn't your problem.

Had a read back through and I can't see it. Unless it's you suddenly pretending that you were not talking about the News of the World issue when you said it?
 
I predict News Corp will shut down the NOTW and rebrand it The Sun on Sunday. Most of the people that buy this rubbish won't know it's essentially the same and lap it up.

This whole thing is sickening and all those involved should face heavy punishment.

My prediction came true with a 7 day The Sun confirmed.

If only I knew the lottery numbers.
 
My email is in my trust if you fancy having a go ;)

Is it really confirmed with the rebranding?
 
Last edited:
I'll do the work for you.

It was this one: http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?p=19276966

Yep, a very serious thread and a very serious 'anti-Scottish' rant from me, clearly :rolleyes:

And the other one?


Why do keep throwing the dictionary definition at me when I am pointing out that the word just isn't that simple?

...
Racial discrimination typically points out taxonomic differences between different groups of people, although anyone may be discriminated against on an ethnic or cultural basis, independent of their somatic differences. According to the United Nations conventions, there is no distinction between the term racial discrimination and ethnicity discrimination.

There is some evidence that the meaning of the term has changed over time, and that earlier definitions of racism involved the simple belief that human populations are divided into separate races.[4] Many biologists, anthropologists, and sociologists reject this taxonomy in favor of more specific and/or empirically verifiable criteria, such as geography, ethnicity, or a history of endogamy.[5]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism

So I ask again is it impossible for a Scotsman to be racist against an Englishman or an Irishman and vica versa?

Because if you think it is, then I can see why you hang on the 'race' part of racism and ignore ethnicity. It's not a point of view I agree with in any event, so while one man may see a joke another sees racist intent.



Yes, they are. You haven't yet shown me why your accusations of me being racist or xenophobic are founded.

You've absolutely failed here. You've been proven wrong and proven to be a liar. You are now trying to wriggle out of it - firstly by pretending you never called me a racist, secondly by arguing that there is no accepted definition of racism.

No, I've explained them to you. You haven't been polite enough to explain or evidence your outburst either.

If I've absolutely failed then I've failed and I'm afraid my life will never recover, yet you haven't proven me to be a liar I'm just not running around searching for evidence of something when you aren't either.

And if the accusations are to continue, then I'm not pretending I never called you a racist. I did.

As for your repeated 'definition' argument here, I assume this to be willful ignorance so I'll let it pass. :)
 
Last edited:
[TW]Fox;19536786 said:
Had a read back through and I can't see it. Unless it's you suddenly pretending that you were not talking about the News of the World issue when you said it?

Oh well. Perhaps it has different meanings but up here it's an informal synonym for the party and it's sphere of influences and it's percieved heartland. Again, I'm sorry if the word Etonian upsets you. I better watch the next time I mention 'Call me Dave', I can't help it I like cuddly names for my politicians. Although I can see why this distraction is so conforting, because it's a distraction.. ;)
 
Oh well. Perhaps it has different meanings but up here it's an informal synonym for the party and it's sphere of influences and it's percieved heartland. Again, I'm sorry if the word Etonian upsets you. I better watch the next time I mention 'Call me Dave', I can't help it I like cuddly names for my politicians. Although I can see why this distraction is so conforting, because it's a distraction.. ;)

It doesn't upset me, it just means 'Somebody who went to Eton'. Thats what an Etonian is.

Suprisingly enough.

Using the term 'Etonian' to describe people who never attended Eton is just plain bizarre.
 
And the other one?
What other one?


Why do keep throwing the dictionary definition at me when I am pointing out that the word just isn't that simple?
All the dictionaries and definitions there disagree with you.


So I ask again is it impossible for a Scotsman to be racist against an Englishman or an Irishman and vica versa?
It depends if they're of different races and being prejudiced towards one-another based on that characteristic :confused:


And if the accusations are to continue, then I'm not pretending I never called you a racist. I did.
Your accusation about my being 'racist' is still unfounded, you're still lying about me posting 'anti-Scottish rants'.
 
[TW]Fox;19536910 said:
Using the term 'Etonian' to describe people who never attended Eton is just plain bizarre.

Well yeah and no, I can see your point of view absolutely but it's like trying to explain slang :o :D

Call it ignorance partisanship or hatred et al, but it isn't unusual lets say in an example of a percieved Conservative backhander to business or something along those lines to be derided as 'giving business to their Etonian chums' etc. It's clearly a jib, normally wholy unjustified but such is certain in levels of politics/people. When you read it enough, it sticks unfortunately on some level. There is a lot of stick still given to the tories up here, and sometimes bits of it just slip through by accident if I'm honest. You have to remember that Conservatism for now is all but wiped out here, there aren't many proponents for it and it's something both sides, rightly or wrongly, can attach on. I may be guilty of picking up 'erroneous' politico slang, but I'm certainly not jealous or racially introverted or prejudiced.

Institutionalised? :confused: ;) :D
 
Last edited:
What other one?

Quite hard searching on posts with nothing in it and 'the' in your name does something funny to my searches :mad:

It wasn't isolated though and I'll find it.



All the dictionaries and definitions there disagree with you.

And you still aren't understanding that the issue goes well beyond a simplistic argument based on the dictionary defintion.


It depends if they're of different races and being prejudiced towards one-another based on that characteristic :confused:

Are the Scot's English Welsh and Irish different races then, if you want to take this sideline?

Why not answer, can they be racist to one another yes or no?


Your accusation about my being 'racist' is still unfounded, you're still lying about me posting 'anti-Scottish rants'.

Just as your accusations of prejudice and jealousy are unfounded, and I'm not lying at all you rant off occasionally about quite a few topics. It's all subjective mind, what's a rant to me is someone elses gospel...
 
Back
Top Bottom