- Joined
- 27 Aug 2005
- Posts
- 3,715
Wow it seems that I'm not the only one although my mistake was only minor in terms of cost
I once used "exists" instead of "in" in the where clause of an SQL update statement once. Chaos shorty ensued![]()
On site at a large call center I walked into the server room and tapped the mouse pad to flick the screen save off on the database server, I tapped the mouse pad the the server blue screened..
As no one had seen me go in I walked back down to reception and called my contact to say I had arrived (I thougth there was not way on this earth they would believe I had not done anything to cause hte issue - other than tap the mouse pad).
He was very pleased I had jsut arrived as they had a serious system issue all the telesales people had jsut been kicked out of the database!!!
Sorry.. off topic here.. where abouts in Rugeley do you live fella? used to live there for 18 years before I moved to Cannock![]()
What does that mean in this context?
[TW]Fox;15790837 said:It's a group of clinically similar proceedures which are grouped together for the purposes of apportioning cost to proceedures etc. In this context it means that it would be a pretty interesting code if the proceedures involved cost £7500![]()
i blame an early start but today was about to set off to morcambe to do deliveries, reversed out of parking spot straight into the front of another truck, got out to check it and it was fine(was only going about 2 mph) so left it. got back to have boss come over asking did i have a bump this morning, i said i grazed a truck but didnt do any damage but it turns out i put a hairline crack in the bumper that will cause something to happen( which i didnt listen to) but its going to cost £700 for a new bumper.