MOH vs COD:BO

Every time I change a setting within cod my screen goes yellow and hands for a few seconds. SO yeah the menues within cod are pain.
 
Forde said:
If the lag is fixed BO will be my FPS MP for at least a year (probably) but I wouldn't call it epic. How is it epic?
Click to expand...

I've been looking for a game I enjoy online to play within a clan competitively, I think I've found that with BLOPS, so that makes it epic in my eyes.
 
deleted said:
COD would be leading the field by a huge margin if they fixed the lag issue. It's an epic game.
Click to expand...

I bought both games and this is the truth. MoH is a 5 minute thing until CoD7 comes out!

CoD7 would be great if only it worked properly! I think if it gets completely sorted (and the last patch improved things no end) it will be the game that MW2 should have been.
 
havent played BO yet, but friends have said its the COD formula with added area's like wager matches and stuff online, SP is meant to be quite good too.

I picked up MOH yesterday thanks to PapaLazaru's thread on here, £13.49!!. Only had a quick dabble on first mission but quite awesome so far!....defo worth the reddies
 
Relentless81 said:
How so, explain?

I'll start,

MOH has superior graphics
Click to expand...

Graphics mean naff all.

Community and miles better gameplay is where it's at.

COD has a few problems which will be ironed out, and then once the mod tools are out, it will ultimately be the best shooter to date.

MOH has nothing going for it, it may look pretty but the gameplay is crap and really boring.
 
In your opinion, I think its a much better game. Like I say the graphics are just one thing.

I think the gameplay is better and the engine is much better, COD is to arcadey. As for community i'm a regular on BC2 and MOH servers, anything with dedi servers features communities

I cant see how COD BO will be the best shooter to date, its nothing more than a rehash of games released before it, its tired and desperately needs updating
 
black ops if you have it running smooth (mine is as smooth as my cod 4) then it wipes moh ass everyday of the week.

moh is not bad graphically but more things to do in bops.
 
For me:

Singleplayer: MoH > BC2 > CoD:BO
Multiplayer: BC2 > MoH > CoD:BO

I am enjoying CoD but the campaign was awful, whereas the MoH SP was really atmospheric, the cutscenes were fantastic.
 
I prefer MOH in every aspect.

I bought Black Ops today and I feel robbed!

The graphics in Black ops are so bad I can't bring myself to play it, |I don't understand why so many rate it.

Saying that MOH can get a bit boring after a few hours play.
 
Last edited:
Garyj881 said:
I prefer MOH in every aspect.



The graphics in Black ops are so bad I can't bring myself to play it, |I don't understand why so many rate it.
Click to expand...

Why do the graphics matter? Seriously everyone keeps mentioning the graphics.

I'd rather have a game with sub-par graphics and decent gameplay. Does the graphics really factor into whether you can play the game or not?
 
The graphics are poor, the game play is far from smooth and the sound, where do I start?

MOH is very immersive, the sound on BO is very poor, I actually checked my headphones to make sure they were plugged in correclty.
 
I'm currently playing MoH SP after buying it for £13.49:D and I'm quite enjoying it. It's a nice change of pace compared to COD's hectic fire fights. That's not to say COD is a bad game, far from it. But I think they are very different in their play styles and so it's a bit difficult to rub them against each other.

Like COD I play MoH in small doses. I find it's the best way to enjoy them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom