Soldato
- Joined
- 23 May 2006
- Posts
- 7,894
This came up in another thread but rather than me derail there i thought i would ask here.
Generally at my work most people are constantly hoping for pay rises... And i know there is a minimum, and at some point if you do not get that minimum you NEED more money... but i am wondering at what point reducing hrs and emplying an extra person would be more beneficial to morale and output.
7 years ago we had a child, and along with contract issues at work, combined with me wanting to have a day to spend with my baby I chose to take a 12% paycut and hr cut and work 4 (longish) days a week.
Without having a child and without being told there would be a job loss unless between us we cut some hrs I never would have done it........... But now i have it is one of the best work decisions i have ever made, and if i have my way i will never work another Friday again.
For me my Friday off is far more precious to me than £300 a month.
Am i in a minority? perhaps i am just not ambitious enough.
Generally at my work most people are constantly hoping for pay rises... And i know there is a minimum, and at some point if you do not get that minimum you NEED more money... but i am wondering at what point reducing hrs and emplying an extra person would be more beneficial to morale and output.
7 years ago we had a child, and along with contract issues at work, combined with me wanting to have a day to spend with my baby I chose to take a 12% paycut and hr cut and work 4 (longish) days a week.
Without having a child and without being told there would be a job loss unless between us we cut some hrs I never would have done it........... But now i have it is one of the best work decisions i have ever made, and if i have my way i will never work another Friday again.
For me my Friday off is far more precious to me than £300 a month.
Am i in a minority? perhaps i am just not ambitious enough.
Last edited: