More stars in the universe than grains of sand on all the beaches in the world...

The statistic that always amazes me is that if you scale the cosmos down, and our Sun and Proxima Centauri were the size of grains of sand, they would be five miles apart.

Our insignificance in the grand scheme of things is as terrifying yet awe inspiring as Arthur C Clarke suggested.
 
prove it ?

surely just a theory unless someone has seen and counted that many :p

As used in science, a theory is an explanation or model based on observation, experimentation, and reasoning.

It's not to be confused with the use of the word in general language.
 
And If were are the only living creatures then its an awful waste of space

So true, but even the closest Earth like planet is some crazy amount of light years away.

Star Wars and Star Trek etc will never be for real.

Check "The Universe with Stephen Hawking" 3 episode series, it's mind blowing.
 
And If were are the only living creatures then its an awful waste of space

Well the Universe is mostly vacuum (or very close to it) and if you were to drop a golf ball on the centre spot at Wembley Stadium and that represented an atomic nucleus the innermost electron orbits would be up in the back seats somewhere.
So even the tiny percentage of matter in the universe is mostly empty.

And the Universe is expanding.


Space is pretty much all there is.
 
There's a good thread here:-

http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/14303-number-of-connections-in-the-brain/page__st__40?

that shows the maths and references estimates for neuron numbers (100billion) and average individual numbers of connections per neuron (7,000). The number of pathways that it throws up is bigger than the number of atoms in the universe

Someone uses 100billion and 3000 connections per individual and calculates 10^8432. There is estimated to be 10^80 atoms in the universe. Yes, not all of them are used, but they do exist.

There would be a lot more atoms in the universe than that, as those who do the figures and get those results, tend to only take into account stars.

This works out at a quick guide, but does not take into account space itself, which is not a total vacuum, planets, asteroids, giant dust clouds etc so the actual number tends to be a lot higher.

Quick edit: it still will not get to anything like 10^8432 though
 
Last edited:
I've had more fights than there are stars, planets and meteors throughout the whole universe.. that's more of an interesting non-sense, unfortunately It's not a fact :(

This subject makes me think how insignificant we are :o
 
Well the Universe is mostly vacuum (or very close to it) and if you were to drop a golf ball on the centre spot at Wembley Stadium and that represented an atomic nucleus the innermost electron orbits would be up in the back seats somewhere.
So even the tiny percentage of matter in the universe is mostly empty.

And the Universe is expanding.


Space is pretty much all there is.

Very true.. This also amazes me, as much as the infinite amount of stars that exist.
 
The universe must be teeming with life.

I always thought that the meaning of life was that life is a way of the universe to know itself.
 
This stuff allways amazes me, it's hard to put this stuff into any kind of perspective but I allways remember what Bill Bryson said - If the Earth was shrunk down to the size of a garden pea pluto would be a mile and a half away.
 
Here's another thing that amazes me.. If a black hole was to wonder into our solar system, one that's maybe 20miles in diameter. Well anyway if it came close enough, it would compress the entire planet to the size of a golf ball. Atoms having so much space between the nucleus and electons, it would compress the entire world / planet to the size of a golf ball... BUT IT'LL STILL WEIGH THE SAME as the entire planet.. Try picking up that golf ball infront of a lady !!!
 
Back
Top Bottom