Mortgage Rate Rises

Its the housing stock mainly owned by the state? Hard to balance being profitable for the owners and not too burdensome on Tennant.

It's not. And I am way outside my comfort zone but my recollection was it works a little like this.
  • At the time of becoming a tenant you pay a fair market rate that is determined by guidelines set by the state. It is reflective of housing pricess and of course increases over time. So you only move into something you can afford (or afford with benefits) at the start of your rental journey.
  • Tenants then have certain protections so your rent can only increase moderately, something like a little less than underlying inflation or similar. The idea I think is that rent becomes more affordable over time or certainly not worse if salaries and benefits can close to keep up with inflation
  • Pay your rent on time and you can't be chucked out - tenants have a lot more protection than the UK
  • Now the market rate for rental for a new tenant may increase faster due to property prices but your existing landlord can't take advantage of that while you're paying your rent on time.
  • This discourages too many wannabe landlords making a quick buck because there isn't one to be made.
  • If housing prices and thus market rate for rent increases faster then as a tenant who maybe isn't advancing in life financially you basically stay where you are since you can't be chucked out but you also can't afford to start afresh at market rates if you enter a new property. So you can't move but you'll always have a roof over your head which is the whole point here.
  • All this keeps housing prices moderately in check because there's no fast cash to be made
  • As a result of all this landlords tend to end up being more "institutional" buying blocks of flats. So with much less turnover of tenants they rely on a larger portfolio so their average rental at a given moment in time in the block is "OK" for a return - a mix of people there decades paying well below market rate and newer ones paying more for the same thing. Remember new tenants where you've previously had long term tenants will pay market rate which is likely to be considerably more than the outgoing tenant who'd been paying an index linked amount for decades that is probably well short of property price inflation and thus the rental rates. Keep your rental property portfolio longer and the returns become more than acceptable since your mortgage/financing won't change much.
There are other things like additional property taxes on non citizens and property taxes that are disproportionately higher for bigger properties so the poorest aren't penalised etc.

I caveat all this again by saying this was my interpretation from 20 years ago so I may have been completely wrong then and now.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
shop around tbh

you can get top rates from the odd building societies with more relaxed lending criteria than the usual high street banks if you use some independant mortgage advisers.

dread to think what my rate will be in 2 years time >.<
 
Last edited:
shop around tbh

you can get top rates from the odd building societies with more relaxed lending criteria than the usual high street banks if you use some independant mortgage advisers.

dread to think what my rate will be in 2 years time >.<
I wish we could do this but we're locked in to our lender unless we want to ERC with half our mortgage. It's partially why I've decided it is best to take a shorter fix, meaning we can align the products renewal times sooner and get out of being locked in to one lender.
 
shop around tbh

you can get top rates from the odd building societies with more relaxed lending criteria than the usual high street banks if you use some independant mortgage advisers.

dread to think what my rate will be in 2 years time >.<

I think it is a bit like the energy companies now. You can't really shop around because the rates are just so bad. We renewed in January with Barclays who we are with gave us the best "loyalty" rate that no one else could match. 3.48% over 3 years.
 
I wish we could do this but we're locked in to our lender unless we want to ERC with half our mortgage. It's partially why I've decided it is best to take a shorter fix, meaning we can align the products renewal times sooner and get out of being locked in to one lender.
Ah thank you...that has reminded me why I did what I did last August when I fixed for 2 rather than 5 years on part of my mortgage.

I am out of sync by about 5 months (March 2024 and August 2024 renewals). Unclear if I'll get any flexibility to combine, or have to stomach the fully variable rate I go onto for part of it :o
 
Ah thank you...that has reminded me why I did what I did last August when I fixed for 2 rather than 5 years on part of my mortgage.

I am out of sync by about 5 months (March 2024 and August 2024 renewals). Unclear if I'll get any flexibility to combine, or have to stomach the fully variable rate I go onto for part of it :o
Yeah I asked the same alignment question during a panic "should we renew now what's the rate aaaaarrrrhh" phone convo during the Trussing and I either didn't get a straight answer or I forgot :o
 
5 Year Fixed
3.99% (Fixed)
£176.05
per month
Above figures based on: No fee
Details
Select
10 Year Fixed
4.29% (Fixed)
£180.14
per month
Above figures based on: No fee

I Have a small mortgage due renewal. I'm stuck between these two. What do ya think?

It's such a small difference in monthly fee so I doubt it matters much either way. The 10yr one has a lower aprc
 
Last edited:
5 Year Fixed
3.99% (Fixed)
£176.05
per month
Above figures based on: No fee
Details
Select
10 Year Fixed
4.29% (Fixed)
£180.14
per month
Above figures based on: No fee

I Have a small mortgage due renewal. I'm stuck between these two. What do ya think?

It's such a small difference in monthly fee so I doubt it matters much either way. The 10yr one has a lower aprc
At such low value it makes little sense imo to fix for 10 years. You'll soon be at a position where a bank loan or interest free CC could be exploited?
 
At such low value it makes little sense imo to fix for 10 years. You'll soon be at a position where a bank loan or interest free CC could be exploited?

Ah yeah hadn't really considered that.

After five years there will be a balance of £20k left on it. The 10 ill be about half that.

There us also 2yr fix at 4.49%
 
5 Year Fixed
3.99% (Fixed)
£176.05
per month
Above figures based on: No fee
Details
Select
10 Year Fixed
4.29% (Fixed)
£180.14
per month
Above figures based on: No fee

I Have a small mortgage due renewal. I'm stuck between these two. What do ya think?

It's such a small difference in monthly fee so I doubt it matters much either way. The 10yr one has a lower aprc
It's upsetting that my mortgage payments are 10x what yours are...

I would be going for the 5 year fixed and overpaying as much as possible to clear it in 5 years.
 
Last edited:
It's upsetting that my mortgage payments are 10x what yours are...

I would be going for the 5 year fixed and overpaying as much as possible to clear it in 5 years.
I wouldn't worry much mate, that small mortgage was just something I took to carry out building work on our bigger mortgaged house. That one I'll have to worry about in a couple more years.

I wish this was the only debt I had!
 
Ah yeah hadn't really considered that.

After five years there will be a balance of £20k left on it. The 10 ill be about half that.

There us also 2yr fix at 4.49%
5 seems like the sweet spot and then see what the crack is w.r.t. clearing the 20k. At such low values the cost of managing the risk seems like a bargain imo!
 
Back
Top Bottom