I shouldn't have reacted and called you an idiot. But your dismissive nature of the problem has riled me.
Don't worry about it, I've been called a lot worse. It's the kind of topic where people can end up bunkered down due to it directly affecting them in a big way
How is it any different to targeting tax or benefits at the groups that need it? Why shouldn't the pain be spread more across the different wealth levels that exist? We're not talking taking assets for the state, just making sure that everyone pays their fair share of the economic pain, rather than the burden being skewed towards mortgage holders only.
If this is 'a touch of Marxism' then fair enough.
Because what you're asking for is idealism. Unfortunately it can never work because humans are selfish in their nature. Any system put in place to try and do what you suggest will end up being manipulated and abused to further people's individual circumstances resulting in a bigger divide, mostly because the wealthy can afford to protect their assets to ring fence them from the proposals.
This means the middle class (which you are part of I assume) would have a larger burden to support the poorer than they would.
Being an idealist is admirable but it needs tempered with some realism and pragmatism.
Last edited: