Yes. The published CO2 g/km figure is from the NEDC Combined cycle (which is a calculation of the Urban and Extra-urban cycles).Are MPG and g/km worked out on the same test cycle?
Yes. The published CO2 g/km figure is from the NEDC Combined cycle (which is a calculation of the Urban and Extra-urban cycles).Are MPG and g/km worked out on the same test cycle?
A litre of diesel produces 2620g of CO2, and a litre of petrol produces 2390g of CO2. So, yes, quite easily Jez!
EDIT:
Assuming my calculations are right:
For petrol vehicles: 6752 / Imperial MPG = CO2 g/km
For diesel vehicles: 7402 / Imperial MPG = CO2 g/km
At 30 MPG in your S you are producing 225g/km, and at 10 MPG you are producing 675 g/km.
Odd thread - Bhp is pretty irrelevant to the NEDC CO2 figures.
The car never even gets near peak power on the NEDC
The ratio as we are calculating it in this thread is irrelevant.[TW]Fox;16999786 said:In a low CO2 but high BHP car, you get to have fun when you play and save money on tax and fuel when you dont, just not at the same time![]()
But is a 136 HP car with 80 g/km better? THE RATIO WOULD SAY YES.[TW]Fox;17000297 said:I think 272bhp cars with 170g/km of CO2 are a good thing.
But is a 136 HP car with 80 g/km better? THE RATIO WOULD SAY YES.