Motoring related Q&A thread

I fancied adding my two pence worth to a few of these. I think what would be good is to have an official motors Q&A/FAQ with answers, and then you can debate/disagree/add to that answer through consensus.
I assume it's because a human knows when to change gear much better than a computer because you know what's coming (a hill for example or a traffic jam) - the same way I always get much better MPG driving without cruise control than with, plus it must use a tiny bit of fuel to 'run' the autobox.
Sort of true. It certainly used to be the case, before automatics had the sort of 'intelligence' they had now, that they would relatively frequently make bad gear decisions. However, good modern automatic transmissions are so effective at deciding on a gear, that they are actually more fuel efficient from that perspective than manual transmissions.
Yeah sorry it was meant to be RPM, I have my dag dag, do I red line it, or do i shift up at 3.5. Same with economy, do I shift up pre spool, or let it boost a wee bit
For purposes of maximum economy it's relatively hard to tell. Early would be a good bet, but not so early it labours in the next gear. The idea of waiting for peak torque isn't true (think of a VTEC - peak torque may be at 5000 RPM and it's certainly not most fuel efficient to even slowly work your way to 5000 RPM instead of just changing at 2000 RPM).

For maximum performance you want to shift when the acceleration in the next gear, at the lower RPM, is greater than the gear you are in at the higher RPM. Acceleration can be inferred from the amount of torque at the wheels, and that can be calculated by using a torque curve of the engine output (ideally the wheel output, as if it's engine output you need to factor in non-linear increases in transmission losses) and the gear ratios. You can then plot a curve for each gear on a graph with an X axis of MPH and a Y axis of torque at the wheels. Where the curves cross over is where you need to change gear for maximum acceleration.
Are RWD cars as hard to control in the wet as people say they are?
That depends how hard people say they are. The reason FWD is considered 'easier' or 'safer' is that in a situation where you lose traction due to driving too fast in to a corner or accelerating too hard during a corner it is relatively intuitive to resolve it - just let go of the pedals. If you lift off after entering a corner too fast you will begin reducing speed, some weight will transfer to the front, and more traction will be available for the car to corner rather than accelerate, resulting in an overall increase in your directional control. If you are accelerating too hard when cornering and lift off, then instead of understeering and running wide, it will very quickly return to cornering without accelerating. There is the possibility of lift-off-oversteer, but that is reasonably rare unless you are seriously pressing on or you have relatively poor rear tyres. Even if it does happen, it often corrects itself in light situations.

Those situations in a RWD car result in the overteering instead of understeering, and lifting off in that situation will likely snap you around in the other direction, causing a spin. The speed of your reactions and ability to override your instinct to lift off are key to not binning a RWD car. Most people don't test themselves in these situations until it's actually happening, usually when it's wet and they are going too fast, so it's no surprise they crash.

In a modern car equipped with an Electronic Stability Control (ESC) system I would say there's little difference day-to-day between RWD and FWD per se, but the extra power typical of RWD cars often contributes to problems.
 
Lol, I love that:

"Here's my opinion... you'd be best to ignore it" :D

Damn right you can never be too careful :p like yourself, pretty much all the cars I have owned get driven hard and as of yet the worst thing I have had to put up with in 8 years motoring is a hgf.

I just figure its a 200bhp/ton car made for driving fast so it would be criminal to drive it around like a nanny. If that means redlining first, second and 3rd all the way up to 100+ then so be it... All I know is that I am gonna miss mine the next few weeks :(
 
What is the most efficient way of changing gears in a petrol car? Keep revs low? Also, is engine braking bad for the car and/or fuel economy?
 
if you lower a car how much does it change general handling. Improvement or make it worse? Is fully ajustable suss better then pre set?.

If you lowered the car by any ammount is it always good practise to change the springs too or will stock cope?
 
What is the most efficient way of changing gears in a petrol car? Keep revs low? Also, is engine braking bad for the car and/or fuel economy?

A modern engine will use no fuel while engine braking. In my old car dropping a gear and letting the engine slow the car down resulted in 999.99mpg reading from the computer. Good news I feel.
 
What is the most efficient way of changing gears in a petrol car? Keep revs low? Also, is engine braking bad for the car and/or fuel economy?
Typically low, but not so low the engine labours. Rate of acceleration has a much more significant impact on fuel efficiency than any normal shifting RPM.

Engine braking is not bad for the car and it aids fuel economy in most cars as they are able to suspend the injection of any fuel therefore temporarily providing infinite MPG. However, it does reduce your road speed, so is useful only when you do not need to maintain speed or want to slow. Coasting can be more economical if you want to keep speed up. In automatics it'll make little difference if you shift in to neutral or not.
 
Typically low, but not so low the engine labours. Rate of acceleration has a much more significant impact on fuel efficiency than any normal shifting RPM.

Engine braking is not bad for the car and it aids fuel economy in most cars as they are able to suspend the injection of any fuel therefore temporarily providing infinite MPG. However, it does reduce your road speed, so is useful only when you do not need to maintain speed or want to slow. Coasting can be more economical if you want to keep speed up. In automatics it'll make little difference if you shift in to neutral or not.

Coasting is bad mkay.....
 
Back
Top Bottom