Motorists vs Cyclists

Soldato
Joined
12 Jan 2004
Posts
3,172
Location
Brighton
Hmm. How can I start this thread without trying to sound like I am starting a fight? Discussion, communication, those are both good things.

Anyway, I'm a cyclist. I cycle backwards and forwards a couple of miles to work. I have to constantly fight against motorists who don't give you the time of day, treat me like crap, try to drive me off the side of the road, deliberately drive close to the curb to stop cyclists passing. Parking on cycle paths. Pulling out in front of me (or just blatantly ignoring me). I almost got hit by some old lady the other day, I checked both ways, no traffic for about 20 seconds, pull out, she deliberately pulls out in front of me and I have to jam my breaks on hard to not get knocked over. She just looks at me as to say "bur"... totally gormless.

My general opinions of motorists and their cars : spend thousands of pounds on petrol guzzling, over the top metal boxes, which you seem to think are "super high technology" despite being invented > 100 years ago and pretty much having a minimum of 35-50% of the main functionality being identical. Most of the problems that motorists have are due to being totally self-centred - they could take public transport or cycle, but either its not convenient to them or they simply prefer to drive. And so they all compete against each for extremely limited road space.

My absolute pet peeve are those middle aged fat guys/women with bad attitude driving around in their expensive car, trying to blast everyone out of the way and wondering why, when they are 1 person in a 15k car, there is so much traffic on the road. Of course, I highly doubt they could cycle a kilometer without having a heart attack, but hey, fat is all the rage in middle age it seems.

I for one, would hate to drive in Brighton. It is *absolutely* chock full of cars. The roads were designed for horses and carts, for petes sake!

So, for the future :

More people = more cars = more pollution, congestion and waste. This is not sustainable. I say, ban all personal cars from the main roads around cities, and implement some sort of secondary infrastructure. How badly this affects businesses relying on the infrastructure for deliveries etc, I will never know.

Now, I have chatted to a lot of people, and the situation looks like this. The opinions I have expressed above seem to ring true of most cyclists. The other view, that of the motorists, seem to be pure hate of cyclists, get off the roads, pay some tax why don't you, try carrying heavy shopping why don't you, etc etc which I have also heard before. Most of these views are that cyclists are an inconvenience, an annoyance, to motorists. Not that the motorists themselves are an issue, that they compete with each other every. Single. Rush hour. You don't get 15 mile hold backs of bicycles.

There *must* be some compromise. I am well aware that motorists are people, cyclists are people, and we all need to get around. It also hasn't helped that trains have stopped cyclists taking their bikes in peak times now... meaning more people are going to turn to their cars when they don't want to walk a couple of miles when they arrive after commuting.

/meh braindump
/mental note to self, structure things properly in future
 
Whats a cyclists? One of those slow motorbike people? That swerve all over the place and act irrationally and dont follow the highway code? Screw them, hippies!
 
Whats a cyclists? One of those slow motorbike people? That swerve all over the place and act irrationally and dont follow the highway code? Screw them, hippies!

heheh indeed, I have seen many cyclists that don't follow the road rules properly, cycle up one-way roads etc.

Still, if there were less motorists I doubt we would even need to have so many one-way roads. They were only produced to control traffic flow around cities, as well as restrict the use of narrow roads. This wouldn't be such an issue if cars weren't 3 meters wide... just to seat one person!
 
I pay more tax to use the roads than your bike cost.

Therefore, stop moaning. Us motorists pay for the roads you use for free.

Also, I don't tell you what sort of bike to use so don't tell me what sort of car to use. If I wish to use a 4.7 metre long, 2.8metre wide car just to take myself to uni I will, as it's my choice, just as it's your choice to use a mountain bike on a public road.
 
[TW]Fox;10220214 said:
I pay more tax to use the roads than your bike cost.

Therefore, stop moaning. Us motorists pay for the roads you use for free.

You pay for the roads for you to use. The roads wouldn't require such maintenance if you weren't driving on them.

Also, the government squanders your road tax for all sorts of crap. Don't blame me, blame the government.
 
I think the road system within towns and cities should be dramatically changed to allow safe passage and cycle only lanes so you can get where you want to go quickly and safely. After seeing what they've done in amsterdam it makes our system look **** poor, they have the majority of cycle lanes completely separated from the roads so you need never come in contact with any motor vehicles. If we had a system like this, i'd ride my bike a hell of a lot more. I haven't done so for two years, ever since i got knocked off and broke my collarbone.
 
[TW]Fox;10220214 said:
Also, I don't tell you what sort of bike to use so don't tell me what sort of car to use. If I wish to use a 4.7 metre long, 2.8metre wide car just to take myself to uni I will, as it's my choice, just as it's your choice to use a mountain bike on a public road.

I guess that totally confirmed by opinion that motorists are selfish. I could use a tank to get to uni, though it might screw up the road surfaces, and annoy all the motorists stuck behind me, but its my choice.

I *don't* have a choice of what bike to ride, I can (of course) only ride bicycles that have been manufactured, just as you can only drive cars that you can buy. But if the automobile manufactures were told to stop producing 2.8 meter wide 4.7 meter long cars, tough luck, you wouldn't be able to use it, kick and scream all you like.
 
You pay for the roads for you to use. The roads wouldn't require such maintenance if you weren't driving on them.

Also, the government squanders your road tax for all sorts of crap. Don't blame me, blame the government.

We wouldn't require the road network if we didn't use cars. You don't need 4 lane roads into citycentres for people to ride bicycles on.
 
[TW]Fox;10220256 said:
We wouldn't require the road network if we didn't use cars. You don't need 4 lane roads into citycentres for people to ride bicycles on.

Damn straight! But... I kinda feel like you answered you own comment there.
 
commie pinko liberal crap

How do you think your bike got to the shop you bought it from? How do you think the parts got to the factory?

Where did all the stuff your house is built from get there?

How do you think anything gets anywhere?

How good do you think the roads would be if there were no cars? They'd still be dirt tracks and you'd be complaining about horse riders getting in the way.

Use your brain and stop being a hippy.
 
deliberately drive close to the curb to stop cyclists passing.

Reason we do that is cos you're a bloody pain in the backside to overtake. Seriously, I've waited 2 minutes for a gap in traffic so I can overtake a cyclist on a narrow road then at the next set of traffic lights you go past, ignore the red light and I have it all to do again.

And please, don't pretend like cyclist's are perfect. I've already mentioned riding through red lights - I've seen a lycra lout ride through a pelican crossing while the green man was showing at at least 30mph, and I've been hit by a cyclist riding along the pavement - it bloody hurts let me tell you. :mad:
 
How do you think your bike got to the shop you bought it from? How do you think the parts got to the factory?

Where did all the stuff your house is built from get there?

How do you think anything gets anywhere?

How good do you think the roads would be if there were no cars? They'd still be dirt tracks and you'd be complaining about horse riders getting in the way.

Use your brain and stop being a hippy.

Hey, I didn't say anything against company infrastructure type vehicules. I said nothing against HGV's, construction vehicules, fire engines, police cars, ambulances etc etc. I didn't say anything against the use of the internal combustion engine for genuinely useful causes.

I just don't see you driving down the shops as a genuinely useful cause. And a hundred years from now, with mountains of crap being generated as part of industries that are based on your convenience eating away at natural resources and damaging the environment, I am looking for alternatives.

I don't believe that *personal transport alone* is the only reason for good quality roads.

And I also don't believe that slating someone for "being a hippy" really lends credibility to your argument, although in this case it was simply misplaced because I have no issue with most traffic.
 
I like bikes and cars. I cycle to uni as its better for me and those around me. Its also quicker.

I don't have too much of a problem with car drivers. The problem I do see is cyclists not respecting the highway code, in particular lights and paths, and drivers looking for cars at junctions, rather than whats coming, sort of like on auto pilot. Oh and also not always appreciating that cyclists have equal right to road space, and are willing to stand their ground on it.
 
Also, if a car is driving close to the pavement, they might be letting a motorcyclist through on their right.

Motorcyclists are more important than you, we pay road tax and stuff. So you lose.
 
Anyway, I'm a cyclist. I cycle backwards and forwards a couple of miles to work. I have to constantly fight against motorists who don't give you the time of day, treat me like crap, try to drive me off the side of the road, deliberately drive close to the curb to stop cyclists passing.

Well there's your problem right there, how can you see where you are going?
 
Also, if a car is driving close to the pavement, they might be letting a motorcyclist through on their right.

Motorcyclists are more important than you, we pay road tax and stuff. So you lose.

You also cause obsene amounts of pollution which makes us cyclists cough with dispair :/

edit: On a side note, regarding narrow roads, if I'm on one I look back often and if there's a car behind me that i'm holding up I pull into a gap between parked cars or mount the pavement till the car passes. I know drivers are a most impatient bunch.
 
Last edited:
Hey, I didn't say anything against company infrastructure type vehicules. I said nothing against HGV's, construction vehicules, fire engines, police cars, ambulances etc etc. I didn't say anything against the use of the internal combustion engine for genuinely useful causes.

So basically you want the roads to be reserved for:

Stuff you need to get to the shops so you can buy it

and you on your pushbike?

Nice attitude.
 
Back
Top Bottom