As you might have come across in some other threads on the Asus P87 Pro, I have been on of the unfortunates who got a board that's not being cooperative.
While it's on it's way back/RMA, a friend brought over a Gigabyte UD4 and a MSI GD55.
Without going into massive detail, one of the boards is now a spare and I could choose which I wanted.
I told him I was waiting on the Asus Pro to come back, and he asked why I didn't take one of his boards, get myself up and running, and then sell the Asus board?
My initial thoughts were:
A) I chose the Asus Pro, darnit, i want the Asus Pro!
B) A lot of reviews showed it as the stronger brand for overclocking.
C) It has the bluetooth built in
D) The UEFI BIOS is the slickest of all available at this time
But after mulling over it a few days, I'm starting to think that those reasons aren't that great.
So playing self-Freudian games, my counter arguements to myself were:
A) Get over it, you can't always get what YOU want
B) A lot of reviews also show the other boards as strong OC, all 1155 are strong OC.
C) You don't even have any bluetooth devices yet, and you can buy a baby dongle later.
D) The UEFI Bios on the MSI is plenty good for OC, and obviously much nicer than a standard BIOS.
So at this point I was heading down the MSI road and continuing the self-Freudian, I came up with some positive notes:
A)The GD55 has the PCI slots at the bottom of the board. The Asus P87 has one on each side of the second PCI E slot.
This means that your soundcard is smack between two GPUs, blocking one of the GPU intake fans, and also warming up the soundcard unnecessarily. With the GD55 you don't have this problem.
B) The GD55 has it's power led/hdd led/reset/power ground/speaker blocks broken up. On the Asus, the block is one piece on the corner of the board. You can't use a long GPU in the third PCI E lane, because the case power block is in the way.
C) The GD55 overclocked in reviews, to within a few hundred mhz of the Asus Pro; in some cases, it went higher. It should be sufficient that 4.5 ghz on stock air cooling is achievable.
D) The GD55 is close enough as a direct competitor to the Pro. GD80 flagship vs. Asus Sabertooth; GD65 enthusiast vs. Asus P87 Deluxe; GD55 vs. Asus P87 PRO?
Correct me if I am wrong, but I'm really close to using the GD55 and telling Asus to take a hike and selling that board when it returns.
Anyone else considered the same?
Anyone have any personal and insighftul comments about pros/cons of the MSI series so far- and to the point so that I am ok to use the GD55 instead of the GD65 like Beast did?
While it's on it's way back/RMA, a friend brought over a Gigabyte UD4 and a MSI GD55.
Without going into massive detail, one of the boards is now a spare and I could choose which I wanted.
I told him I was waiting on the Asus Pro to come back, and he asked why I didn't take one of his boards, get myself up and running, and then sell the Asus board?
My initial thoughts were:
A) I chose the Asus Pro, darnit, i want the Asus Pro!
B) A lot of reviews showed it as the stronger brand for overclocking.
C) It has the bluetooth built in
D) The UEFI BIOS is the slickest of all available at this time
But after mulling over it a few days, I'm starting to think that those reasons aren't that great.
So playing self-Freudian games, my counter arguements to myself were:
A) Get over it, you can't always get what YOU want
B) A lot of reviews also show the other boards as strong OC, all 1155 are strong OC.
C) You don't even have any bluetooth devices yet, and you can buy a baby dongle later.
D) The UEFI Bios on the MSI is plenty good for OC, and obviously much nicer than a standard BIOS.
So at this point I was heading down the MSI road and continuing the self-Freudian, I came up with some positive notes:
A)The GD55 has the PCI slots at the bottom of the board. The Asus P87 has one on each side of the second PCI E slot.
This means that your soundcard is smack between two GPUs, blocking one of the GPU intake fans, and also warming up the soundcard unnecessarily. With the GD55 you don't have this problem.
B) The GD55 has it's power led/hdd led/reset/power ground/speaker blocks broken up. On the Asus, the block is one piece on the corner of the board. You can't use a long GPU in the third PCI E lane, because the case power block is in the way.
C) The GD55 overclocked in reviews, to within a few hundred mhz of the Asus Pro; in some cases, it went higher. It should be sufficient that 4.5 ghz on stock air cooling is achievable.
D) The GD55 is close enough as a direct competitor to the Pro. GD80 flagship vs. Asus Sabertooth; GD65 enthusiast vs. Asus P87 Deluxe; GD55 vs. Asus P87 PRO?
Correct me if I am wrong, but I'm really close to using the GD55 and telling Asus to take a hike and selling that board when it returns.
Anyone else considered the same?
Anyone have any personal and insighftul comments about pros/cons of the MSI series so far- and to the point so that I am ok to use the GD55 instead of the GD65 like Beast did?
Last edited: