Associate
- Joined
- 7 Feb 2009
- Posts
- 3
I have a MB that currently holds a quad core 775 based Intel processor and 8GB of DDR2 ram and one 8800GTX graphics card, from which I run two Dell 24" monitors - I have been given a second 8800GTX and want to be able to run three monitors, each capable of running a different application (I am a graphic/web designer) - I have no need to run SLI but have been given conflicting reports on whether running two graphics cards on a new motherboard, one with the primary screen, the second running two more will actually work..(i.e. give me three independent desktops)..has anyone done this, general info on both the Nvidia web site and other forums is sketchy to say the least....and seeing at I have bought all my kit from the excellent Overclockers for the past five four years this seemed like a logical please to ask... so will this work, and what is going to be the best motherboard...does it have to be an SLI board even though I don't need SLI, or can another chip set that provides two PCIe slots do the trick....I also have the possibility of adding a third 8800 GTX - would this be a better solution (having a card per monitor?)....or is the extra heat/power consumption/instability going to be an issue? (not really sure I want a 1200-1300w power supply, three cards, loads of RAM and three screens heating my office during the summer !)
I am currently running Vista64 (to gain access to the extra RAM) but are happy to use XP if Vista is not capable (the latest Nvidia driver for V64 seems to give far less control of multi monitors and I wonder if that's going to be an issue - you cant span monitors fro example)
Thoughts anyone?
I am currently running Vista64 (to gain access to the extra RAM) but are happy to use XP if Vista is not capable (the latest Nvidia driver for V64 seems to give far less control of multi monitors and I wonder if that's going to be an issue - you cant span monitors fro example)
Thoughts anyone?