If you don't need/want quick Access times, ie < 8ms, I would just buy 2 x 320GB 7200.10s and RAID0 those instead of buying 2 Raptors. 2 of the new 16MB cache Raptors won't give you much more of an increase in Average read over the 2 x 320GB 7200.10s, what it will give you an advantage in, is the Access time, ie 7200.10s, 13ms, Raptors < 8ms, however, with the Raptors, you get less GBs for your £, that the 7200.10s.
When you RAID0 the 7200.10s, try using a stripe of 32KB, a good general size for running all kinds of applications.
Thats exactly what i used! 32k stripe. and another point i forgot how noisy my 15K scsi drives are.duel boot. these seagate 10's are so quiet and i used to use raptor drives which were also noisy.
I have an earlyer seagate 250g SATA1 think its a 9 that i use for storage. anyway it dosnt come close on performance to the 10's but has been 100% reliable as a storage drive.
If WD were to bring out a SATA2 10.000rpm 16m raptor at 150g + i would imagine they would fly. but at the moment the transfere rate these 10's get is impresive! and the main reason i choose them over the 16m raptors. As a plus look at the price performance! the seagate drives are a great buy!
cheers guys
I just want the fastest - I don't really mind if I get less space as I already have a hardware RAID 5 array for storage. I want the fastest to load vista & apps. From the access times you quote, it sounds like a single raptor for system and a single raptor for apps might be the quickest?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.