Deleted member 651465
Deleted member 651465
Cool people don't have avatars at all. *snooty*
Who said that? Oh yes, generic poster #3621

I generally miss people without avatars as they blend in to the background.
Cool people don't have avatars at all. *snooty*
Who said that? Oh yes, generic poster #3621
I generally miss people without avatars as they blend in to the background.
[FnG]magnolia;19481987 said:I don't even know why they bother with avatars. There's only, what, 5 to choose from for however x thousands of members? How unique.
That's why I don't use them.
Pointless really.
Not trying to drag an old subject up, but I kinda like them. It's something a look for in a poster, see how many posts they have, it goes part of the way for me figuring out if a poster is a serious ocuk member and it may make me respect their views a bit more as opposed to a user with just 5 posts. It's sort of like a mark that they have "served their time" or at least contributed a lot to the ocuk community.
Strangely enough wasn't me that noticed but my sister the other day when on my PC.
[FnG]magnolia;19482013 said:I disagree completely with this but let's put that aside for one moment. How does a picture of a character from a film indicate any of what you said? Surely that's post count, not the avatar?
Yes, but generally, the two go hand in hand, unless the poster chooses to stick with the "lower ranked" avatar. Obviously what I said is not entirely true half the time, but I use it as a simple off the cuff way of judging somebody here, nothing more than that, and it is wrong at least half the time.![]()
What about those without an avatar![]()
*laughs at sub 10,000 post peasants.*