cmt said:
agreed, as once he has the photos it will be very easy for him to keep cutting the price or stalling hoping you will give up.
I would also make it clear what you will allow the photos to be used for.
cmt
Under normal circumstances I would agree. In this case, the 'customer' appears to be getting a little awkward, and possibly more trouble than he's worth. Mainly though, you don't have a written contract and good luck to anybody who thinks they can get a client to agree to restrictions on usage after the fact.
Personally and in this case, I'd get the £100 (and definately wait for the cheque to clear before handing the pictures over) and run. I smell a small rat, so get what you are due, the money agreed on that night and then don't look back. Just concentrate on what could be your next gig from somewhere else.
For a normal, civilised commission, with a proper contract (and it's amazing how these can morph rapidly into something you don't expect on the day), I would have looked at this gig in this way.
Client has asked me to take pictures of the night. Although I own the copyright, it was on their premises (was it?) so therefore they have also given me explicit permission to shoot on what is technically private land which means they make the rules. Whatever this alludes to should be in writing naturally (under normal circumstances). I'd then price the job up with the idea that the client wants the high quality jpegs etc to do with as they wish and leave it at that.
In this case though I'd give up on protecting the usage of the images with the thought of maybe making anymore money out of them later.
What does work in your favour, is that although he can have a copy to do with as he wishes, there is no written contract that stops you from doing what ever you wish with the images either, AND of course, you still own the copyright.
Does any of that make sense? I've had a long day.
