VIRII said:They will argue that it is not their fault that it was lost in the post. They will argue that he needs to take it up with Royal mail. They will also probably have something in the small print about insurance through the post being his responsibility.
He need to check out their small print then. However as stated before THEY paid for the stamps not him.... id be very interested to hear what trading standards have to say about this situation. If a customer follows the company RMA procedure to the letter then how can it be his problem?
From a trading standards point of view i bet they would be very interested as to just how may other items have "been lost inthe post" to this company. Seems to me like a good system to never replace any goods!... "hmmm its been lost in the post. sorry not our problem". Sounds like a very good system to have a 1man returns department. For the price of 1 wage and a shed load of stamps they NEVER have to replace any items!

TBH i suspect that if the OP reads the full terms and conditions i bet the packaging they sent is wrong... sounds very very odd to me that they would use non recorded post. ( i used to work in returns and we always used recorded for this very reason).
Last edited: