nano technology.... wow

Jokester said:
There was an interesting story today on the BBC about nanotechnology being used to repair damaged nerve fibres and restoring sight in hamsters.

Here

Jokester
Yeah I saw that too, does everyone seem to have the BBC News - Tech RSS Feed? I do.
 
The self replicating machines and "grey goo" scenario is pretty much not going to happen.
 
daz said:
Was it a proper lecture on the ins and outs of nanotechnology, or was it a lecture full of hype?

Hype, about nanotechnology, nooo neveeeeer.

Oh and by the way, stems cells are going to mean we will live forever, and cure cancer. And kill aliens, plus make bad people good.

ya rly!

jonc
 
shimy182 said:
ehhhmmm whats the difference of the 2?
Nanoscience and nanotechnology? Not a lot to be honest I'd imagine. Nanoscience seems to be the processes involved in achieving the fabrication of the technology. In general it would be science on the nano scale (10^-9 meters).

So far we've covered methods of manipulating surface atoms and recording surface properties on the nano scale. Now we have just started on Liquid Crystals.
 
Last edited:
There wont be a 'big bang' breakthrough when it comes to nano technology - it will simply be a continuation of what we're already seeing.

Lets face it, look at cpu fabrication - we've gone from130nm processes to 90nm process, and i think i read soemwhere that IBM are looking into a 30nm process.

Sooner or later things like CPUs will have portions built with 'bottom-up' nano-technology, rather than 'top down' lithography, but at the end of the day there wont be a big change, as the 'top end' of nano is close to the 'bottom end' of conventional technology....
 
i thought the fact that its possible to make 1cm (squared) of something can save 1.2 terrabyte was exciting. And thats by using SELF aligning atoms or something.
 
Back
Top Bottom