Nas Box or Microserver

My personal experience is that if you just want a simple network file store then a NAS is the way to go, if however you think you might want to make use of the device for other things then get a microserver.
I should have bought a microserver, there's too much faffing and hacking involved in getting the NAS to do other things for my liking.
 
I faced a similar situation but ended up buying N40L and chucked ubuntu on it. It's good.

Upside: I can do whatever I like with it.
Downside: It takes a bit more time to set up.
 
I got a HP Microserver with the £100 cashback offer, it's excellent and we use it all the time. I more or less run it 24/7, it runs uTorrent and 99% of our data is stored on it. We've cut our PC HDDs down to just a Windows SSD and a single regular hard drive which was a big improvement on the amount before!

Since I bought it I've put 4x 2tb Samsung F4s in, plus a small HDD for the OS and run Windows Server 2008 R2. I bumped the memory up to 8gb and plan to run backups from there like the poster above, maybe install ESX and create a test domain for helping me with my MCITP.

Lots of options and really pleased with it.
 
I faced a similar situation but ended up buying N40L and chucked ubuntu on it. It's good.

Upside: I can do whatever I like with it.
Downside: It takes a bit more time to set up.
is this linux operating system and does it work fine for a media server aswell?
 
Yeah, ubuntu is a linux distribution - but if you have to ask that question, you might be better off with WHS or going the NAS option! :) :)
 
Yeah, ubuntu is a linux distribution - but if you have to ask that question, you might be better off with WHS or going the NAS option! :) :)
maybe but can always experiment....lol...money isnt a issue either not looking for the cheapest way just the best way...looks like a microserver can be fun...rather than a normal nas box lol
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom