Associate
Unraid boots from a usb key where the id of the usb drive is used as the license for the software - and usb key speed isn't a problem as once booted it runs in memory
I'd never personally used UnRaid before, I personally use Proxmox as my virtualization and ZRAID as my file system parity provider. I always assumed it was a choice whether or not you install UnRaid on a usb device. Apologies if my assumptions spread misinformation here.
For instance what is he doing that requires 64gb of ram and yet only 8 cores.
I at least have the 64 GB of VRAM as my current 16 GB Quad core virtualization/Nas server it a little RAM starved. I agree that 64 GB is a too much, but also want to beable to upgrade to a 12 or 16 core if the price of those chips drops enough. At 16 core 64 GB is just right. I've had issues in the past not being able to find QVL server RAM in the used market retrospectively, and given the (relatively) small proportion of the cost £140 represented I decided to just go with the larger capacity, I had budget for either another 10TB of disk or the step up from 32 to 64 GB of RAM. To be clear I also didn't (deliberately) mean to suggest 32GB, I personally value ECC so would suggest the KSM32ES8/16ME stick of CL 22 3200 speed ECC RAM, which would have come in at between £143 to £181 for a 32GB kit. Even then I can justify 64 GB given that ZFS can make use of large amounts of RAM, as ZFS runs best with 8GB+1GB per TB, which would be 48GB of RAM for the 2 cores running the file server and providing the file system parity. That then leaves 16 GB of RAM for the remaining 6 cores worth of VM's to use.
In any case all I was trying to say was that OP's kit isn't exactly cheap, which I assume others were also trying to communicate. I also don't expect that OP justifies the RAM usage in the same way I do.
Last edited: