Need to be within 2-3 feet to see the difference between 4K and Blu Ray - proof

Domi said:
I am sorry but once again we have someone spouting there own opinion on this subject as fact.

...

I am not actually saying you can see a difference on a 46" at 10 foot, you probably cannot but I am simply stating that I would like to know.

Not opinions actual testing.
Click to expand...

Lots of science on the resolution that the eye can distinguish at 20/20. 4K on 46 inch at 10 ft is not it.

http://www.rtings.com/tv/learn
 
Netflix 4K only fails when there's a lot going on and the compression can't handle it.

Does a very nice job outside of action scenes, pans, etc.
 
Ste said:
Lots of science on the resolution that the eye can distinguish at 20/20. 4K on 46 inch at 10 ft is not it.

http://www.rtings.com/tv/learn
Click to expand...

That site is showing a chart stating at 9ft you can not see 4k on a 55inch TV. (or that the difference is very very slight and not worth it)

The same stupid charts that have been doing the rounds since the announcements of 4k.

The test I posted above showed of 50+ people tested based on that stupid chart only 1 failed to correctly identify the 4k.

I absolutely do not believe the information on that site is accurate.
 
lol... I can tell the difference on a 42 inch 4k screen when source is 4K vs 1080p

What REALLY is noticeable is either interpolated frames (motion compensation) or judder on either source. MEMC is just plain awful, and judder... well... total distraction. 4K quality video.... very good.

Also... for music... I really dislike MP3's. I nearly always here the electronic buzz with encoded tracks, they have to be higher quality for me not to notice.

Bottomline, everyone is different, one shoe does not fit all.
 
Well i don't disagree with your point of view for most home users you seem to be scewing what the article said to further your own point of view and ignoring the point, written as a headline in bold that
"The real take-home is that Netflix 4K is loads better than Netflix Full HD."

... so actually all thing being equal you haven't presented any proof that all thing being equal you need to be 2-3 feet to see the difference between 4 - 2 k
 
Strange post smacking of desperation to "prove" a point? A little while ago you posted a link to another article which showed 48 out of 49 people correctly spotting the difference between 4K and HD at 9 feet?

Psycho Sonny said:
http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/news/4k-resolution-201312153517.htm

55" 4k tv at 9 feet away is slightly noticeable compared to 1080p of same size vs distance.

at 48" you would probably need to be within 6-8 feet of said tv for the very slight upgrade in PQ
Click to expand...
 
Ever since i started looking in this sub forum a month ago Phsyco Sunny has been criticising 4k, I can easily tell the differnce between 1080p and 4k on a 55 inch sitting 9 foot away.
 
Domi said:
That site is showing a chart stating at 9ft you can not see 4k on a 55inch TV. (or that the difference is very very slight and not worth it)

The same stupid charts that have been doing the rounds since the announcements of 4k.

The test I posted above showed of 50+ people tested based on that stupid chart only 1 failed to correctly identify the 4k.

I absolutely do not believe the information on that site is accurate.
Click to expand...

This. I'd take the blind test study you provided over some arbitary chart any day - where does the chart data even come from anyway?
 
The test I'll pay attention to is a side by side caparison of the same film (that has been filmed and mastered @>4k) played to the same quality 4k TV or projector from a good quality regular Blu-ray player and disc and one of the new UHD players with the equivalent UHD disc.

This will make interesting reading - any test that tries to make do with hardware before the proper UHD source material is available is not a proper assessment.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom