Really? The fact that it has to be referred to as "the n-word" is utterly pathetic. We live in the real world not Harry potter's universe. It's like he who must not be named ffs.
Saying that we've got 2 out of the 4 triggered horsemen in here, just need explicit and Vincent next!
Assuming you mean me, give some Examples where I've ever been "triggered"
Right now.
I'm neither offended nor are me feelings hurt.
I always ask for examples when somebody baselessly accuses me of something, and very rarely do they ever back their statements up.
With regard to the story. Need context of what happened and details.
If it was literally a meeting about how to treat/deal with sensitive words, and he used the sensitive word in a list scenario then it's a complete overreaction to sack him.
Context. It's amazingly important.
Are we going to get to a point where dictionaries are censored and no longer contain the word and instead jist simply say "n-word"? At this rate we're probably going to see book burnings!
I hate to break it to you Dis86 but you’re clearly the most triggered person in this thread so far...
Discussing how pathetic something is doesn't mean you're triggered.
Fancy offering an opinion on the point of discussion though?
Classic GD.
Here it shall be that only the lefty lib flakes get 'triggered'. All others are paragons of good virtue and common sense whose grumbles and fist-shakes are righteous and are beyond being triggered. Or so it would seem.
Please explain to me how people with leanings to the political right can post such threads in GD and grumble constantly about their rights, freedom of speech etc being taken away and yet it is only those that lean to the left that are accused of being 'triggered' when they present a counter-view?
Please define 'triggered'.
As for the comments on the OP, I wasn't at the meetings so I would refrain from comment as I don't know the context of these and how the word was used.