Neutrality of reporting

dangerstat · 7 Oct 2009 at 22:27

platinum87 said:
For me neutrality is based on yourself, not what media outlets tell you, i usually dont see any bias because i block it out, i try to just lift certain facts, if they are true or not also doesnt matter

I disgaree, say the BBC started telling me fish fingers where "evil" I'd question it, look at the evidence and form an opinion. If the evidence I read was mis-interpreted by the BBC I'd probably contact them to point it out. But I've never had that situation arise.

platinum87 · 7 Oct 2009 at 22:30

dangerstat said:
I disgaree, say the BBC started telling me fish fingers where "evil" I'd question it, look at the evidence and form an opinion. If the evidence I read was mis-interpreted by the BBC I'd probably contact them to point it out. But I've never had that situation arise.

but most of the time they try to give opinions, thus any facts dont matter

dangerstat · 7 Oct 2009 at 22:31

platinum87 said:
but most of the time they try to give opinions, thus any facts dont matter

No in fact most of the time they present the facts and not opinions.

platinum87 · 7 Oct 2009 at 22:35

dangerstat said:
No in fact most of the time they present the facts and not opinions.

back to first point

Tefal · 7 Oct 2009 at 22:36

Greenlizard0 said:
They're like a lot of things, say movies (e.g. the nationality of Bond villians), .

If movies are to be believed Britain must have train ing camps for supervillins tbh.