The Z87 is out of the window then, buying 2 CPU's to flash a board is bloody useless. I thought the B6 revision would support Devil's Canyon 4690K. But thanks for that.
If you can find out for a fact that Gigabyte have bothered using a BIOS for it that will take Devil's Canyon from the get go, then go for it. Maybe they have. It would just be the first I hear of a Z87 capable of doing so out of the box (other than some Asus boards which don't require a CPU installed to carry out a BIOS flash). Don't rely on the revision date alone.
Won't the extensions just cause more looms of wire being down the bottom end though (hidden or not) with the Golden Green 550?
The extensions are not very long.
- I'd probably go for the G1 for cost and the power I need etc. It confuses me how it has 4 VGA ports on the modular, that's for 2 GPU's, surely that would be pushing 650W then with high end? Back when I remember looking, it was important for like 18v on 12a rails. Is that still the case?
Things have improved a bit on that front over the years. A quality PSU these days (and for a while now) can have a more powerful single rail than two or four rails combined in PSUs of years past. Obviously depending on the models. Just for argument's sake.
That 650W model could run an O/C'd CPU and 2 x 960s for example. Or a non-O/C'd CPU and non-OC'd 2 x 970s.
It's CPU and GPU dependent. If you went for a 290X then it'll only run one, and that's what you'd want for such a card. 550W would be good, 650w even better.
Regaring the braiding cables, love the idea, really do, I could hide a molex, that's fine, just about the slot in the rear PCI panel that needs filling in https://www.overclockers.co.uk/pimg/CA-060-NX_43805_350.jpg
Addressed that here:
These leds come with three brightness options and a PCI adapter thingy (which you can tuck away under the PSU shroud instead of mounting it to a PCI slot, to keep things tidier).
There is no need to actually slot the adapter in a PCI slot. Just place it somewhere below the PSU shroud for example, find the brightness level you're happy with, and close up the case once you're done building.
A couple of other questions... I've had good experience with Gigabyte boards and love their Dual BIOS, is there one of those around the price of the Asus Z97-K? It'd be nice with initial OC pushings to see. Although I'd go safe, I'd have to find that sweet spot after testing and the DB on Gigabytes assisted in any screw ups. - Is this a decent enough contender? https://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=MB-504-GI
Yes. The overclocking ability of CPUs is dependent on the CPU itself for the vast part. A quality motherboard just helps eke out that little bit extra, and find stability on overclocks that would not be quite as stable on other boards. But if you land a great chip you'll easily have a better O/C than someone with a £200 board and a poor chip.
Also, is it a common thing to have to push the memory on these boards as they always seem to state (O.C.) for the memory clocks above what seems to be 1800MHZ?
Anything up to 2400MHz is fine on Z97. Beyond that it starts getting iffy progressively, especially when combined with a CPU overclock. The gains beyond 2133MHz are minimal in general.
Are the FSB straps important? 1:6 / 1:8 is what I have run before. I always heard 1:1 was golden, but really dunno if that's achievable / a big player these days.
No. There's a BCLK strap now* and the memory frequency runs independently of CPU frequency (even though the CPU has a memory controller aboard). So you can up the CPU multiplier without affecting memory frequency for example. This article may be useful as an introduction to how it works: http://www.overclockers.com/3step-guide-to-overclock-intel-haswell/