Associate
Hi all
I have been building my own PCs and upgrading them for quite a while now, since my first 386SX 19 or so years ago, but I haven't done much in the past 4 years apart from updating my CPU to an AMD Athlon 64X2 4200+.
So I'm basically out of touch with all of these lovely new CPUs and graphics cards, but am planning a new build soon.
So to the main (first of a few I suspect) question:
would you guys recommend Intel or AMD?
My first few builds used Intel CPUs, 386SX, 486DX, I missed out on a first-gen Pentium but went for an Amd Athlon, then a number of Pentium2 machines - and I remember getting a dual cpu MSI motherboard from Overclockers with 2x Intel Celeron 300MHz overclocked to 450, then a 2.5GHz P4 but my last couple have been back to Amd again.
I am quite tempted by the Intel i5-2500K with its' overclocking potential, but wondered if I should go for the AMD Bulldozer FX-6 instead? It's a little cheaper, but with 6 cores instead of 4.
Can anyone here recommend going for it?
Ta
I have been building my own PCs and upgrading them for quite a while now, since my first 386SX 19 or so years ago, but I haven't done much in the past 4 years apart from updating my CPU to an AMD Athlon 64X2 4200+.
So I'm basically out of touch with all of these lovely new CPUs and graphics cards, but am planning a new build soon.
So to the main (first of a few I suspect) question:
would you guys recommend Intel or AMD?
My first few builds used Intel CPUs, 386SX, 486DX, I missed out on a first-gen Pentium but went for an Amd Athlon, then a number of Pentium2 machines - and I remember getting a dual cpu MSI motherboard from Overclockers with 2x Intel Celeron 300MHz overclocked to 450, then a 2.5GHz P4 but my last couple have been back to Amd again.
I am quite tempted by the Intel i5-2500K with its' overclocking potential, but wondered if I should go for the AMD Bulldozer FX-6 instead? It's a little cheaper, but with 6 cores instead of 4.
Can anyone here recommend going for it?
Ta