I'm looking to upgrade my E6600 soon.
Putting overclocking aside which would be more worth it?
E8600
Q9550
My current set-up is in my sig if that helps - I'll also be buying 8GB RAM with the CPU.
I muti task a lot, encode the odd video (Premiere, Movie Maker, VirtualDub), quite a lot of VMWare (that's mostly RAM intensive, but a quad would surely help).
Basically just wondering if I should be getting the faster dual core, or the slower quad core for what I do.
I also play a few games (should get ArmA tomorrow, but I'm not letting one game on it's own influence my decision).
I'm leaning more towards quad at the moment for future games, and the multi tasking. I do like the extra power on the E8600 though - what kind of difference would be seen between the two on single-core tasks?
Craig.
Putting overclocking aside which would be more worth it?
E8600
Q9550
My current set-up is in my sig if that helps - I'll also be buying 8GB RAM with the CPU.
I muti task a lot, encode the odd video (Premiere, Movie Maker, VirtualDub), quite a lot of VMWare (that's mostly RAM intensive, but a quad would surely help).
Basically just wondering if I should be getting the faster dual core, or the slower quad core for what I do.
I also play a few games (should get ArmA tomorrow, but I'm not letting one game on it's own influence my decision).
I'm leaning more towards quad at the moment for future games, and the multi tasking. I do like the extra power on the E8600 though - what kind of difference would be seen between the two on single-core tasks?
Craig.
Last edited: