new mobo for Conroe, with ATA, without dual GPU

Associate
Joined
4 Mar 2003
Posts
37
Location
London
I'm planning on building a system around an Intel Core 2 DUO E6600 "LGA775 Conroe" 2.40GHz (1066FSB) - Retail

It's the mobo that I haven't worked out yet. I've been away from the market for a while. My previous two mobos and CPUs were AMD based and not that recently either.

I'll have to get a new graphics card as my present one is a Radeon 9800, probably a Radeon 1950. I've not got strong views as to ATI or NVidia. I have no interest in SLI or Crossfire and I'd rather not pay for it unless it had everything else I wanted and there wasn't another way of getting there.

I'll have to get new RAM; reading these boards, Geil seems popular, though I've always done alright with Crucial, whether the cheap and cheerful stuff or Ballistix.

I've got an Enermax EG365P-VE (350W) and an Antec True 550P (550W) so I guess I'll be using the Antec.

I have two IDE drives and I'd rather not abandon them and the various IDE DVD and CD writers which I'd also like to carry on being able to use. So the only real limitation on choice is that the mobo must be able to offer both legacy ATA as well as SATA support. I'll probably get a SATA drive at the time of the new build but don't want to bin the older drives (I've seen on these boards suggestions that ATA's day has gone and they should be disposed of; I'd rather not, thanks). The alternative to having legacy support is moving stuff around via a USB drive, which I suppose is possible though far from ideal. I've never set up a network and it seems a lot of hassle for the sake of missing a couple of slots on the board. Would be interested to know if I'd suffer dramatically by having legacy support.

RAID isn't a priority though it seems widely available and I could pay for it as it doesn't seem to cost that much these days.

I see some of the mobos offer "fanless cooling". This makes me a little nervous, though maybe I'm out of touch. Quiet is nice but reliable is better.

Overclocking is not a priority though I may give it a go if it's as easy as the reviews say. Last time I tried was with a Thunderbird, so it's been a while :p ; didn't really try with the XP2200.

19" CRT monitor, USB HDD, kb, silly little speakers, FDD, will not be changing.

Budget is not such a limiting factor, but I'm not looking to be extravagant. I've been OK with MSI (twice), don't like EPoX, Tyan was OK (long time back). I hear good things about Asus; I don't know what DFI or Gigabyte's stuff is like.

The rig's stress point will be on-line gaming, though I play around with sound (not video) files a bit too. I'm planning on staying with XP for the time being, though wouldn't want to rule out Vista; very unlikely to be using linux.

The mobo doesn't have to be absolutely the very latest, I would rather it worked on delivery rather than relying on some hoped for BIOS update.

thanks in advance.
 
I know you said you werent interested in a SLI board but the P5N-E SLI might suit your needs perfectly as it has 2 PATA boards so you can use your two IDE hdd's and still have roomt to plug in IDE CD/DVD ROM.

The problem with most new motherboards are that they only have 1 PATA port, also the P5N-E sli is a bargain at about £70-80 inc vat.
 
I would have to agree with Jumping. The P5N-E SLi is probably the only board that meets all your requirements and it just happens to be under £90 which is a bonus. I've had mine almost 3 weeks now and no problems whatsoever (other than when I pushed the overclocks a bit and had to reset the CMOS ;) ).

It really is a refreshing change from the boards where you had to had to flash the BIOS or put in 2 sticks of Value Ram to get it to boot. I think this reflects the fact that it's a consumer oriented board rather than an enthusiast board like the 680i.
 
There are other options -

1. You can attach your PATA devices to the SATA ports of the new board using SATA-->PATA converters.

2. You can purchase a PCI add-in board to provide additional PATA ports.

With either of the above solutions you can just remove the converters/board once you have upgraded your drives to SATA.

Just a thought.......
 
Thanks for the replies.

Would be interested in comments on this set up:

* Asus P5N-E SLi nForce 650 (Socket 775) PCI-Express DDR2 Motherboard Stock Code: MB-221-AS

* Intel Core 2 DUO E6600 "LGA775 Conroe" 2.40GHz (1066FSB) - Retail Stock Code: CP-128-IN

* HIS ATI Radeon X1950 Pro ICEQ 3 TURBO SILENT Heatpipe 512MB GDDR3 TV-Out/Dual DVI (PCI-Express) - Retail (H195PRQT512DD-R) Stock Code: GX-070-HT

* GeIL 2GB (2x1GB) PC6400C4 800MHz Ultra Low Latency DDR2 Dual Channel Kit (GX22GB6400UDC) Stock Code: MY-058-GL

* Western Digital Caviar SE16 320GB 3200KS SATA-II 16MB Cache - OEM Stock Code: HD-070-WD

£674.39 inc VAT, ex del. 22/1/07


In particular, if there are any basic errors in the combination (seen lots of reviews of ATI/AMD cards and NVidia/Intel chipsets so I guess that's OK), any obvious upgrades (faster RAM seems unjustified), or extravagances (is a 512mb graphics card worth the extra £30-ish). I want new kit within the next 10 days (I've been waiting over a year); any heralded price drops coming?

My aim is to have something that is going to keep me near the top, but not at the very top, for about a year. Something that is going to keep me going through Quake Wars: Enemy Territory, Crysis, the new Unreal, Stalker, GRAW2, etc. Not going to get a DX10 card for a while.

I think I'm OK with the HSF on the retail version of the CPU unless I start to overclock, and that won't be necessary for half a year at least?

The RD600 motherboard called ICFX3200-T2R/G is basically aimed at people who overclock for entertainment rather than value for money, so it's not really the right one for me, tempting as it is? The Asus P5N-E SLi nForce 650 is a forgiving, yet high performance, general purpose mobo?

Any extra cooling recommended when using everything at stock speeds and voltages (system will be under gaming load for hours at time)? The Antec True 550P (550W) will bear the load?


Would welcome any advice. thanks
 
Last edited:
That spec's fine.

The extra video RAM is better suited for larger res monitors. If you're running at 1280x1024 then it's probably not worth the extra money.

The PSU is fine too.

And the stock Intel heatsink is fine at stock speeds.
 
Back
Top Bottom