A bit of a kick in the nuts for Spurs and an odd decision from the PL & Sky that the opening game isn't going to be televised. The Palace game was originally selected to be shown on Sky but they've now changed that and will be showing the City - Cardiff game instead.
I think it was an odd decision from Sky, especially as it was due to be televised anyway but I can't see it impacting them. While I'd guess more neutrals would rather watch the Spurs game, I don't think there's a great deal in it because of the title race factor with the other game and I doubt that too many would be bothered enough to find an illegal stream rather than just watch the City game on Sky.Jokes on them, people will just stream it.
I think it was an odd decision from Sky, especially as it was due to be televised anyway but I can't see it impacting them. While I'd guess more neutrals would rather watch the Spurs game, I don't think there's a great deal in it because of the title race factor with the other game and I doubt that too many would be bothered enough to find an illegal stream rather than just watch the City game on Sky.
No idea. Not quite the same situation, although the main camera positions etc were in the main stand, but the first game following Liverpool's new main stand was televised. I'm sure the first game at Wembley would have been televised too although I can't remember for certain and similarly, I'd guess the first game at the Emirates would have been too.Is it possible Sky don't want to do a live event in a new stadium without having done a broadcast from there yet? As in what if there are issues, drop outs, etc, better that footage goes into a highlights show than a live broadcast that has issues?
anyway, from the pictures of the stadium I see football has finally caught up to modern technology, every seat with a drinks holder... Emirates was a decade too early for this extremely new technology and it's sorely missed. The risk of getting a drink tipped on you when a goal is scored and everyone jumps about like idiots is fully 25% lower at the new Spurs stadium.
Is it possible Sky don't want to do a live event in a new stadium without having done a broadcast from there yet? As in what if there are issues, drop outs, etc, better that footage goes into a highlights show than a live broadcast that has issues?
anyway, from the pictures of the stadium I see football has finally caught up to modern technology, every seat with a drinks holder... Emirates was a decade too early for this extremely new technology and it's sorely missed. The risk of getting a drink tipped on you when a goal is scored and everyone jumps about like idiots is fully 25% lower at the new Spurs stadium.
Sky are professionals, and they would have had some input when the stadium was being developed.
None of the normal seats have drinks holders, and I don't want that either. There's loads of room between seats now anyway, so you can just put them on the floor.
I did a photosphere thing from my seat, gives you an idea of the room between the rows, but the seats are right next to each other, no gaps.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/QWJWR8d9qzY1Zpf96
The cost of building the stadium had no effect on Spurs' profits.
Already been discussed in the other thread.A mate was there last night and said loads of empty seats? surely not
Shouldn't it be discussed here considering this thread is all about the stadium?Already been discussed in the other thread.