easyrider said:Thought you had conroe?
lmao, im not pimping my conroe
easyrider said:AM2 is slower in all things.Just pointing it out
take that back
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
easyrider said:Thought you had conroe?
easyrider said:AM2 is slower in all things.Just pointing it out
<maddness> said:lmao, im not pimping my conroe
take that back
<maddness> said:what graphics card do you have?
im purchasing this tomorrow
Asus M2NPV-VM Micro ATX (Socket AM2) PCI-Express DDR2 Motherboard (MB-145-AS)
http://www.overclockers.co.uk/acatalog/Socket_AM2_Asus.html
as it has a buit in 6150 with dvi and vga + and a pci-e slot
Except he doesnt want to change his AGP card. What card have you got Ives?Mattus said:If you're upgrading anyway, I don't see any reason to go for 939 over AM2. Performance is the same and they're both very cheap now, and DDR2 RAM is no dearer than DDR any more. Plus AM2 has an upgrade path where 939 is dead, retailers are just selling off what they've got.
Well thats the board for the win thenahmed5 said:Note that the Asrock Dual Sata2 can be upgraded to AM2.
Hi mate.Except he doesnt want to change his AGP card. What card have you got Ives?
Actually my 2500 is OC-ed to 3200Yes you could save a bit of money going s939 and keeping your current RAM, but if you're thinking along those lines why not also keep the motherboard and just upgrade your 2500 to a 3200 (or an XP-M oc'ed to 3200 speeds, and always assume your motherboard will take one of those of course), saving even more money?
sgoaty said:Well thats the board for the win then
In real terms, DDR2 at higher speeds provides better bandwidth performance than DDRR1. At lower speeds such as at DDR400, DDR1 is usually faster thanks to a reduction in latency.