Nightmare on Elm Street

l33t-krew

l33t-krew

l33t-krew

Permabanned
Joined
27 Mar 2007
Posts
270
Hello all. Sorry about posting at this time of the morning.

Just watched Nightmare on Elms Street.

Has anyone else seen this movie :rolleyes: stupid quesion im sure,

Could someone explain the ending for me. It sorta threw me


p.s Are there any more in the series.


Would rate it 6/10. Was kinda lame, and had aged poorly.

Still it was worth it to see the look on my dads face :D

He thought it was good but thought the ending was ****
 
If I remember, the car that they drive off in has a hood the same colour as freddie's jumper. Basically, they couldn't beat him. And he was taking them away to do whatever he wished.

Its not a bad film, but its not a great one. Would you keep that glove in your house?!
 
lol hell yeah!

I wasnt bad, just the ending wasnt clear at all.

It shoulda been either "they got away and lived happily ever after" or "OMG it looks like they were sliced and diced"

Just my 2pence worth :o
 
p.s speaking of which is Children of Men any good?


Its really wierd. Where I live there is only one movie rental place for literally 60miles in any direction.

All their DVD's have got Not for Rental on them.

Is this allowed or are they on the sly?

Dont care personally as the film seems to be the same
 
l33t-krew said:
p.s speaking of which is Children of Men any good?


Its really wierd. Where I live there is only one movie rental place for literally 60miles in any direction.

All their DVD's have got Not for Rental on them.

Is this allowed or are they on the sly?

Dont care personally as the film seems to be the same
Click to expand...

Ummm yes, it does matter.
What they are doing is illegal.
Companies who loan out DVD's have to pay more for their copies of films because they have to buy a license that allows them to loan out.
You'll notice the blurb about "You may not hire or loan this DVD without express permission of the copyright holder etc"
The Blockbusters of the world etc have to pay a lot for their copies because they do come with express permission to loan.

Personally I would report this company.
It doesn't bother you, that's fine.
However why should they get away with buying a £8 DVD and then loaning it out time and time again when the legitimate companies have paid a lot more for their legal and licensed to loan copies?
It's extremely close to piracy and probably comes under the same laws.
 
Disregard that ending in the first one its not canon in any way.

Yes there is more NMOES films, they all get progressively worse.
IMO The NMOES is one of those series of films you watch to see a "Bad" horror film. I'd actually say that about most of the 80's horror films tbh... Actually I cant say I have seen a horror film that I would define as scary.
 
tommy_knockers said:
can you name any? Having real trouble finding any :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Wikipedia, is there anything you cant answer?

1. A Nightmare on Elm Street, 1984, $25.2m US box office takings
2. A Nightmare on Elm Street 2: Freddy's Revenge, 1985, $30.0m
3. A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors, 1987, $44.8m
4. A Nightmare on Elm Street 4: The Dream Master, 1988, $49.4m
5. A Nightmare on Elm Street 5: The Dream Child, 1989, $22.2m
6. Freddy's Dead: The Final Nightmare, 1991, $34.9m
7. Wes Craven's New Nightmare, 1994, $18.4m
8. Freddy vs. Jason, 2003, $82.1m
 
divaboy said:
first 4 worth watching after that don't bother in fact the 3rd is the best IMO classic line of feeling abit tongue tied :p
Click to expand...

Exaxtly what i was going to say - although 2 is pretty pants.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom