'Noob' could be the millionth English word

Well, change keeps a language vibrant and alive so if we want English to stay as the lingua franca then I guess we've also got to accept that piffle like noob will get added. Although I have to confess I find it less objectionable than some of the other proposed words in that article like "defollow" and "chiconomics" - I mean really, I ask you what is this nonsense?

I agree, language has always been a dynamic social process, and yesterday's slang will be tomorrows accepted convention. However, I also agree that we must start to question the usefulness of some of these inclusions. Are they included according to their usefulness or popularity? I suppose defining 'usefulness' is difficult, as it is a slippery and relative concept .
 
I would rather "noob" was added than "braaap!" or a new definition of "beef" (ie: "You got beef wid me, bruv?")
 
I agree, language has always been a dynamic social process, and yesterday's slang will be tomorrows accepted convention. However, I also agree that we must start to question the usefulness of some of these inclusions. Are they included according to their usefulness or popularity? I suppose defining 'usefulness' is difficult, as it is a slippery and relative concept .

Does it matter why it's included? If it has a meaning and is used by a large enough number of people, and isn't just an abbriviation or different take on an existing word, then it is a part of the language.
 
Does it matter why it's included? If it has a meaning and is used by a large enough number of people, and isn't just an abbriviation or different take on an existing word, then it is a part of the language.

To be honest, I don't think it's used by a large enough number of people.
 
Does it matter why it's included? If it has a meaning and is used by a large enough number of people, and isn't just an abbriviation or different take on an existing word, then it is a part of the language.

Exactly what i think. ;)

Never heard it, but I like this one
"greenwashing" (what companies do to appear environmentally friendly)

You have never heard the word Noob :eek: Where have you been?! :p
 
Does it matter why it's included? If it has a meaning and is used by a large enough number of people, and isn't just an abbriviation or different take on an existing word, then it is a part of the language.

Well, I hope you don't mind me saying, but why they are included does seem to be important to you, as you include certain prerequisite textual qualifications, such as not being 'an abbreviation' or a 'duplicate' of an existing word. I'm just interested to find out what people's thoughts are as to what criteria are important?

Point taken though, the frequency of a word's use may be a more important qualification for some people, than any semantic usefulness. How do the people who write dictionaries make these decisions?
 
A noob is a newcomer but it also has negative connotations of someone who will always be bad at the related topic. It's not covered by an existing word :p

Noob.
 
Back
Top Bottom