Suppose that could be similar to:
'there or 'their'
wat?
Well, change keeps a language vibrant and alive so if we want English to stay as the lingua franca then I guess we've also got to accept that piffle like noob will get added. Although I have to confess I find it less objectionable than some of the other proposed words in that article like "defollow" and "chiconomics" - I mean really, I ask you what is this nonsense?
I agree, language has always been a dynamic social process, and yesterday's slang will be tomorrows accepted convention. However, I also agree that we must start to question the usefulness of some of these inclusions. Are they included according to their usefulness or popularity? I suppose defining 'usefulness' is difficult, as it is a slippery and relative concept .
Does it matter why it's included? If it has a meaning and is used by a large enough number of people, and isn't just an abbriviation or different take on an existing word, then it is a part of the language.
Does it matter why it's included? If it has a meaning and is used by a large enough number of people, and isn't just an abbriviation or different take on an existing word, then it is a part of the language.
Never heard it, but I like this one
"greenwashing" (what companies do to appear environmentally friendly)
Does it matter why it's included? If it has a meaning and is used by a large enough number of people, and isn't just an abbriviation or different take on an existing word, then it is a part of the language.
A noob is a newcomer but it also has negative connotations of someone who will always be bad at the related topic. It's not covered by an existing word
Noob.
No. A newb is a newcomer, a noob is just a plain idiot.
A US web monitoring firm has declared the millionth English word to be Web 2.0, a term for the latest generation of web products and services.
GLM said Web 2.0 beat out the terms Jai ho, N00b and slumdog to take top spot.
Web 2.0