Not directly employed

Permabanned
Joined
28 Dec 2009
Posts
13,052
Location
london
Is anyone out sourced or contracted or temp or basically non permanently employee of a company, but yet you work internal to the company and are permanently based there ?

Basically I work for an IT company that has various clients and with the IT company we don't get any benefits what so ever but the law firms that we are permanently based at have a long list of benefits.

private healthcare
gym membership
full pension
bonus
share scheme
loads of other benefits
35 days sick

What we get with it company:
Annual bonus if we are lucky.
20 days leave increases to 25, 1 a year.

It just seems so unfair that we don't get any of these benefits but have to work for the same company. I have been working at this place 3 years now.

What also annoys me is the attitude that the staff have with us. The secretaries and this other homosexual from accounts always ask the internal staff if they want a coffee but never ask us. I just think that is very rude, I asked them why they don't ask us if we want a coffee as we are just in the next office, they said because we work for X company. I don't realy see how that should make any difference.

I heard from this old guy at my previous job that there was a new regulation that forces employer to give contractors the benefits that normal staff get because employers were using this technically to avoid giving benefits to staff that were essentially perm staff.
 
You agreed to the contract when they employed you right? If you wanted more benefits you should have gone for a different job.
 
you're a contractor you don't get benefits.

the regulation he is talking about was aimed at agency workers temping at a company where you should get the same benefits as permanent staff after a certain amount of time (12 weeks i believe). however a lot of agencies force you now to either go Umbrella or open up your own Ltd.

With being a contractor you're not bound to anyone so you can always leave and you also get paid a lot more than permanent staff :)

if you don't like it leave.
 
I thought that temp and contract workers had to have the same rights as permanent staff?

Only after 12 weeks on employment and saying "the same rights" is a bit of an overstatement.

As a temp myself who has been working for the same company for three years I checked out the new rules and there are plenty of clauses and stipulations that mean you don't actually get the same rights.

You can still be 'let go' at any time for example with no recourse or redundancy pay.
 
I have worked at their premises for 3 years. They don't pay me directly but i work for them as much as anyone else here.

They don't pay you, they pay your employer. They pay then significantly more than you get paid I bet. They do not need to give you their benefits and tbh most of them will be tax offset things which need to come from your employer.
 
groen-er the moan-er

108a6nt.jpg
 
The temp/agency workers thing was to provide the same rights/benifits as full time staff.
There was a period you have to had worked for before this kicked in however.

I thought it was 12 months but info Im seeing at the moment 12 weeks.
I can't unfortunatley find the info I read at the time of this happening tho.

Have a read here: http://www.tuc.org.uk/workplace/tuc-20079-f0.cfm

As pointed out above tho contracting is completely different.
 
All the contractors in know get a much better rate and pay a tiny amount of tax. Normally covers the difference in benefits and then some, but they can be laid off with just a months notice and no redundancy ofc.
 
Back
Top Bottom