The only thing they have to do is ATTEMPT to make reasonable adjustments, which quite clearly they haven't in this case - how could they if they haven't even attempted to discuss before imposing the change? You only have the right to REQUEST flexible working, not the right to be granted it. If the emplyer refuses, it has to from a limited list of specified reasons - if they give a reason outside those specified, they'll get bent over at an employment tribunal (I know, I've done it three times - you'd think they'd have learnt after the first couple!).
If I was a union rep there, I'd take them to the cleaners. But - and this is entirely a guess - I bet there isn't a union presence there. I wonder why they think they can get away with it?
Makes me laugh when people say "oh, unions aren't needed any more with the good employment laws we have now". Well, those laws are only any use if you make your employer accountable to them, which rarely happens in 1 employee vs employer cases.
We don't have a union or a rep, there are 40 or so staff which rises in the summer. They have deliberately changed someone's hours before to make his job impossible as he and his partner worked opposite ends of the day with one car.
I want out of the place, have done for a long time so this is the push I need. Unfortunately for me a friend has offered me a day a week with him to rise as soon as possible but I can't manage on a days income for much more than a few weeks. Options are to find a second part time job I guess, would be worth it for the stress reduction alone.
I got called in on my last holiday to sort some issues with a nas server. Which I did even with both children in tow. The appreciation I got for that was two hours pay, which is about what it took me. To the chap who said they need me more than I need them: I save them a fortune in IT support costs so you're right, given the paltry wage they pay.
I just don't know what to respond to the message with.