Nuclearus Benchmark v2

NucleaRus281007.jpg


Thats not at the speed shown tho...

benching was done at 475x8 (3800mhz)
 
As long as you input the right speed on the webform then it's only the pic that's different.

I wonder why the program, for a few people anyway, picks up the wrong speeds.

Would be nice to see what a Q6600 @ 4.2 would do though. And damn you've knocked my down a place. I'm seriously considering removing my GTX from my water loop!
 
MilanoChris said:
As long as you input the right speed on the webform then it's only the pic that's different.

I wonder why the program, for a few people anyway, picks up the wrong speeds.

Would be nice to see what a Q6600 @ 4.2 would do though. And damn you've knocked my down a place. I'm seriously considering removing my GTX from my water loop!
Click to expand...

TBH mate, IMO it's not a great benchmark for cpu's, takes ram timings into account far too much...

I got it up as far as 20993 but my system isnt stable at that so I wanted to do a fair test... But when I first booted with the ram slackened off from 5-5-5-15 to 5-5-5-16 but with 104mhz more clockspeed it gave me a benchmark 300+ points lower... :confused:

I have the same problem with speed recognition with coretemp as well... I think its cos I have mine set on the 8x multi, which confuses windows :confused:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom