NUCLEARUS BENCHMARK :)

Fothsn · 8 Oct 2007 at 22:52

Rroff said:
Something might have interupted it? virus scanner? etc.

Nope I'll do another run..

Damien. · 8 Oct 2007 at 22:58

Tweeked mine a little bit.

Rroff · 8 Oct 2007 at 23:09

Hmm I should put a quad core on this one hah - I know it will be stable enough to run this at atleast 3.5gig with a Q6600.

Fothsn · 8 Oct 2007 at 23:17

Strange this :confused:

Tried it 5 times now,

Looks like a Vista problem?? seems a few using Vista have got a rather low number, Hmm..

TheOtherOption · 9 Oct 2007 at 00:37

Q6600 B3 @ 3Ghz

15,906

Rroff · 9 Oct 2007 at 19:16

well my highest ain't much different to my normal one...

BILKO1 · 13 Oct 2007 at 00:52

q6600 go

AndyOcUK · 17 Oct 2007 at 23:13

Holwill · 18 Oct 2007 at 20:02

My first try after moving from a [email protected] to a [email protected]

TheOtherOption · 21 Oct 2007 at 14:30

Q6600 @ 3.3 now - nice increase from 3Ghz - nearly 2k

AndyOcUK · 24 Oct 2007 at 23:47

Wingz · 25 Oct 2007 at 00:16

AndyOcUK said:

Is that at 3.4Ghz? as Nuclearus says its 4Ghz. you using 8X multi i guess.

AndyOcUK · 25 Oct 2007 at 00:20

OOPS!!

You're right mate:

1800FSB X 8 1.525V (450 X 8 +3600)

Thats better

Skinner.Daddy · 25 Oct 2007 at 16:10

jus about to test Hee hee

Traducer · 25 Oct 2007 at 16:40

ChrisD. · 27 Oct 2007 at 00:30

Traducer · 27 Oct 2007 at 14:10

Blah time to buy a Quad Core.

nbkpsycho · 29 Oct 2007 at 16:05

Here is my single core system :

Score : 5,156

marc2003 · 29 Oct 2007 at 16:06

this thread isn't being updated anymore.

Fothsn · 29 Oct 2007 at 16:08

nbkpsycho said:
Here is my single core system :

Wrong thread mate

this one is no longer active, we need a mod to close this.

The new one is: http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=17795829