• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Nuclearus (CPU Benchmark)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Just thought I'd give this a whirl.

[email protected] (not 3.5 Nuclearus reports that wrong)
P5K
Crap OCZ Platinum RAM
Tuniq
HX-620

nuclearusmulticorern4.png
 
E6300 at stock in my work computer. It's a dell, I'm curious as to how much better my home computer with a 6300@stock would be. And how much better it will be when I eventually get to overclock it :)

nucleusbp4.png
 
gt_junkie said:
Not a bad score for stock - just need to get clocking again!

I love these C2D's.

test.jpg


Just gotta save for a Quad then i'll be sorted!

gt
Click to expand...
After my 680i blew up and i sold my e6600 on ready for quad i bought a P4 for £25 to tide me over. It's a 3.4ghz chip:

nuc.jpg


How depressing is that!!! :p :D

gt
 


theres definatly something wrong with my computer:(
i always thought there was any ideas as im getting the same score what pll get with single core cpus?
could this dualsata2 motherboard be holding me back?plus ive overclocked it to the max stable it will go allthough will chaanging the multi in bios improve things as i didnt try that?
 
Last edited:
ok this is interesting .... any ideas ?

3.25 gig , RAM at 1100 5-5-5-15

cpu.jpg


and this is at 3.1 gig, RAM at 1035 4-4-4-10

I thought C2Duos didn't gain much benefit from lower latencies ?

cpu-2.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom